A STUDY for This? DUH: X's Reaction to Study Showing Conservatives Are Happier...
'So Turned ON': One of America’s Most BADASS Presidents Roars Back to Life...
'Cute Speech. CONGRATS': Mark Cuban Shuts Ro Khanna DOWN in SURPRISING Back and...
Smug Libs Melting Down Over UFC at Lincoln Memorial Get Brutal HISTORY Smackdown...
HA! Lefty's 'My Life Sucks Because There's a Trillionaire' Post Goes VIRAL for...
Get the NET! Check Out Popehat's Unhinged COLLAPSE on Lefty Utopia BlueSky Over...
Happy Birthday President Trump! Here's a Top 10 List of All Your KICK-BUTT...
Jim Acosta Likens Trump’s Name Coming Off the Kennedy Center to the Historic...
The Name of Defame: CNN’s Abby Phillip Defends Bakari Sellers Calling Musk a...
‘I’ll Rip Your Teeth Out’: Muslim ‘Civil Enforcement Officers’ Fired After Threatening Bri...
Law Prof Says Karmelo Anthony Is Entitled to a New Trial Because It...
Libs Lose Their Minds Over UFC & Motocross at the WH — Yet...
Hot New Trend: Posting Photos of Yourself Urinating on Austin Metcalf’s Gravestone
It’s ’Gut-Wrenching’ That Thugs Who Broke Police Officer’s Back in Pro-Hamas 'Protest' Are...
Progressive 'Christian' Author Anne Lamott Uses Her 'Last Favor' With God to Beg...

LGBTQ Nation sounds the alarm over the havoc overturning Roe v. Wade could wreak on LGBTQ people who want to start families

When it comes to making the case for ensuring that Roe v. Wade sticks around, we’ve seen some pretty hot takes.

And if this one from LGBTQ Nation isn’t the hottest, well, it’s gotta be, like, waaaaay up there:

Advertisement

Color us intrigued. More from LGBTQ Nation:

If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade this month, as it appears poised to do if Justice Samuel Alito’s recently leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is any indication, abortion may not be the only reproductive care at risk. As Giulia Carbonaro writes for Newsweek, “In a post-Roe world, in vitro fertilization (IVF)—the fertility treatment used by millions of Americans every year—could be in danger.”

And some of those millions of Americans are, of course, LGBTQ people hoping to start families.

“Without the protections of Roe v Wade, it is possible that state lawmakers may feel empowered to create barriers for people to access medical procedures like IVF – which is deeply troubling for LGBTQ+ people and anyone who needs access to IVF to expand their family,” Shelbi Day, Chief Policy Officer at the nonprofit organization Family Equality, tells LGBTQ Nation.

Mkay.

“Making it more difficult for women — sorry, pregnant people — to get abortions will mean fewer LGBTQ people can get pregnant (or adopt children) to start their families.” It really is something.

Advertisement

To say the very least.

Don’t think about it too hard or you might actually give yourselves a headache.

There are several possible places to start. Here’s one of them:

Heh.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos