Repeat the Line: Katie Hobbs' X Account Has a Joe Biden Moment on...
When Ben Crump Shows Up, Expect Fire: Grifting Lawyer Vows ‘No Peace’ in...
Fauci Email Quote Should Have Caused Immediate Concern
Berlin Pride Attack: Known Islamist Abdul Ballout Killed by Police After Leaving 1...
Just Released: While USA Buried Its Dead, Fauci’s COVID Diary Celebrated His ‘Explosive’...
Bombshell on Fox News: Deranged DSA Leader Drops Mask — 'Yes, We Want...
Two GOP Senators Urge No Recess
GOOD! Families of 9/11 Victims Want Mayor Zohran Mamdani BANNED From 25th Anniversary
Dem Sen. Chris Van Hollen Assures Michigan Voters That El-Sayed Will Protect Criminal...
Hakeem Jeffries Reaches Stage Two of Democrat Denial Regarding New Jersey Election Fraud
'You're Late to the MAGA Party!' Dems AGAIN Try to Rip Off (and...
Maximum Overdrive: NBC News Once Again Reports About the Violent Rage of Self-Driving...
People Mag Slams Trump's Transphobic Joke About Kaitlan Collins (and Everyone Has the...
Journo Tells Rupert Lowe a Lot of People Could Interpret 'Anglo-Saxon' as White...
Convicted Murderer Karmelo Anthony Seeks a New Trial, Claims Judge Was Biased

Panicked Politico warns that SCOTUS could soon make it a lot more difficult for the executive branch to control 'wide swaths of American life'

Politico is sounding the alarm over an upcoming Supreme Court ruling that could threaten everyday life as we know it:

Advertisement

More from Politico:

The upcoming decision on the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate oversight offers the conservative justices an opportunity to undermine federal regulations on a host of issues, from drug pricing and financial regulations to net neutrality. Critics of the EPA have clamored for the high court to do just that, by declaring it unlawful for federal agencies to make “major” decisions without clear authorization from Congress.

The Supreme Court and several Republican-appointed judges have invoked the same principle repeatedly during the past year to strike down a series of Biden administration responses to the coronavirus pandemic. Liberal legal scholars worry that the EPA case could yield an aggressive version of that thinking — unraveling much of the regulatory state as it has existed since the New Deal.

And we wouldn’t want that! 

More:

That has implications for other major rules that President Joe Biden’s agencies are writing or defending in court, including wetlands protections, limits on car and truck pollution, insurance coverage for birth control under Obamacare, and even the Trump administration’s attempts to lower drug prices.

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do is going to literally handcuff the federal government from taking action to protect Americans’ health safety and the environment,” said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law professor at Georgetown University.

Advertisement

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do”? You mean, like, respecting the notion of separation of powers?

Is anyone else failing to see what the downside would be?

What Jeremy Clarkson said.

We really are cool with the executive branch’s — and federal government’s — role in our everyday lives being reduced.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement