Crying Woman Shaves Her Head to Protest Shooting of 'Renee Cook'
Apartment Manager Arrested for Voting Multiple Times by Filing Ballots for Former Tenants
Justice Alito Corners ACLU: 'What Is a Man or Woman?' — They Had...
Dashcam Video Shows Anti-ICE Agitator Being ‘Run Over’ by Police
OOPS! Joy Reid Says the Quiet Part Out Loud In Insanely Racist Rant...
Pete Hegseth's Response to Mark Kelly Whining About 'Finding Out' (After He Eff'd...
WHOA: Epstein Files MUST Be DAMNING for Bill and Hillary Clinton to Ditch...
CNN Pours Cold Water on Pathetic Anti-ICE Lawsuit
Chain-Wearing Skeeze I've Never Heard of Made the Dumbest Comparison Between ICE and...
Jessica Tarlov Jumps in the Renee Good DEBATE Because Gawd Knows She Can't...
People Magazine Allows Woke, Mouth-Breathing She/Her to Turn Scott Adams' Obit Into HATE-F...
Lollipop Guild Representative Robert Reich Gets Schooled on What a REAL Dictatorship Looks...
*SNORT* Zohran Mamdani Learns the Hard Way That ICE Doesn't GAF About Him...
Aww, Wassamatta, BUBBA? Bill Clinton Ghosts House Oversight Deposition (Does NOT Sound Goo...
'May He Rest in Eternal Glory and Peace': Scott Adams Has Passed Away...

Panicked Politico warns that SCOTUS could soon make it a lot more difficult for the executive branch to control 'wide swaths of American life'

Politico is sounding the alarm over an upcoming Supreme Court ruling that could threaten everyday life as we know it:

Advertisement

More from Politico:

The upcoming decision on the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate oversight offers the conservative justices an opportunity to undermine federal regulations on a host of issues, from drug pricing and financial regulations to net neutrality. Critics of the EPA have clamored for the high court to do just that, by declaring it unlawful for federal agencies to make “major” decisions without clear authorization from Congress.

The Supreme Court and several Republican-appointed judges have invoked the same principle repeatedly during the past year to strike down a series of Biden administration responses to the coronavirus pandemic. Liberal legal scholars worry that the EPA case could yield an aggressive version of that thinking — unraveling much of the regulatory state as it has existed since the New Deal.

And we wouldn’t want that! 

More:

That has implications for other major rules that President Joe Biden’s agencies are writing or defending in court, including wetlands protections, limits on car and truck pollution, insurance coverage for birth control under Obamacare, and even the Trump administration’s attempts to lower drug prices.

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do is going to literally handcuff the federal government from taking action to protect Americans’ health safety and the environment,” said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law professor at Georgetown University.

Advertisement

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do”? You mean, like, respecting the notion of separation of powers?

Is anyone else failing to see what the downside would be?

What Jeremy Clarkson said.

We really are cool with the executive branch’s — and federal government’s — role in our everyday lives being reduced.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement