Buckle UP Lefty Activist Illegal-Loving Judges: Big (YUUUGE) Immigration Win in Court for...
'Is This All You Got?' Rep. Ted Lieu Joins Latest Dem Desperation to...
SOOO Mad! Lefty Community Note Writers Lose THEIR Minds on CBS Post About...
Dude. So CLOSE! LOL! Mayor Jacob Frey's Whiny 'ICE Invasion' Meltdown Backfires Spectacula...
City of Minneapolis' Posts About Yesterday's ICE-Involved Shooting Fail to Mention Somethi...
Cue Tim Walz Wetting Himself --> Trump Just Made Things VERY REAL for...
WOKE Minnesota Pastor (Nice Rainbows *EYE ROLL*) Details How HE Took on ICE...
BUFFOON! Scott Jennings ROASTS Insurrection-y Tim Walz for Preaching Peace While Sharing W...
Hypocrisy Alert: Obama Veterans Claim They Deported 'Nicely' — No Masks, No Warrantless...
White Middle-Class Homeowners Are the Enemy: Mamdani's Housing Czar Drops Bombshell in Res...
Ana Kasparian: Enforcing Borders = Prelude to Dictatorship. Reality: Lefty Protesters Are...
Governor Tim Walz Encouraged Residents to Stalk and Harass ICE While Agent Was...
Dem Bennie Thompson: Kristi Noem Signaling to ICE Agents They Can Execute Citizens...
Jasmine Crockett’s Aides Try to Hide Her Quick Escape From Reporter With… Poster...
BREAKING: Another Officer-Involved Shooting In Minneapolis As ICE Agent Is Attacked

Panicked Politico warns that SCOTUS could soon make it a lot more difficult for the executive branch to control 'wide swaths of American life'

Politico is sounding the alarm over an upcoming Supreme Court ruling that could threaten everyday life as we know it:

Advertisement

More from Politico:

The upcoming decision on the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate oversight offers the conservative justices an opportunity to undermine federal regulations on a host of issues, from drug pricing and financial regulations to net neutrality. Critics of the EPA have clamored for the high court to do just that, by declaring it unlawful for federal agencies to make “major” decisions without clear authorization from Congress.

The Supreme Court and several Republican-appointed judges have invoked the same principle repeatedly during the past year to strike down a series of Biden administration responses to the coronavirus pandemic. Liberal legal scholars worry that the EPA case could yield an aggressive version of that thinking — unraveling much of the regulatory state as it has existed since the New Deal.

And we wouldn’t want that! 

More:

That has implications for other major rules that President Joe Biden’s agencies are writing or defending in court, including wetlands protections, limits on car and truck pollution, insurance coverage for birth control under Obamacare, and even the Trump administration’s attempts to lower drug prices.

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do is going to literally handcuff the federal government from taking action to protect Americans’ health safety and the environment,” said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law professor at Georgetown University.

Advertisement

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do”? You mean, like, respecting the notion of separation of powers?

Is anyone else failing to see what the downside would be?

What Jeremy Clarkson said.

We really are cool with the executive branch’s — and federal government’s — role in our everyday lives being reduced.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos