Lord of the Rings Trilogy Has Many Elements That Are Difficult to Watch...
Venezuelan Deported to CECOT Last Year Suing the Trump Administration for $1.3 Million
WIN: Second Federal Appeals Court Rules ICE Is Required to Detain Most Deportees
AV Club Ruins Harry Potter Excitement by Whining About Rowling Funding 'Transphobic Causes...
'Pasty, White, Wannabe Cowboy' Markwayne Mullin Says He’s a Cherokee Like Elizabeth Warren
Bringing Death and Disease: Rep. Mary Miller Highlights Illegals with AIDS and TB...
Good: TSA Tipped Off ICE to Woman at Airport With Deportation Order
Dem Rep. Jason Crow Spills REAL Reason Schumer's Shutdown Continues (THIS Is Why...
Church of England Enthrones First Female Archbishop: Years of Tradition Overturned
Cringe: Governor Newsom Press Office Introduces the 'TrumpBot 3000'
Here's Springsteen Promoting US Tour Fighting Authoritarian Admin (While Trump Does NOTHIN...
AI Propaganda Video Shows Iran Hitting Baal-Headed Statue of Liberty With a Missile
What Would Patrick Henry Say to Chuck Schumer Today?
Bodega Bathroom Horror: Trans Illegal Gets Time-Served Deal for Raping a 14-Year-Old Boy
Jimmy Kimmel's Swipe at Markwayne Mullin Helps Explain Why Elitist Dems Have Lost...

WaPo analysis takes a closer look at 'how the Second Amendment was reinterpreted to protect individual rights'

Last week, the Washington Post’s Marc Fisher reminded us that the AR-15 was “invented for Nazi infantrymen” in the late 1950s, many years after the end of World War II.

Advertisement

So, given their apparently very tenuous grasp of relatively recent history, it should come as no surprise that WaPo staff writer Amber Phillips would get 18th-century American history so spectacularly wrong:

Of course this would be considered an “analysis” at the Washington Post:

But historians say that the notion that the amendment protects people’s right to have guns for self-defense is a relatively recent reading of the Constitution, born out of a conservative push in the 1980s and ’90s. (Twitchy editor’s note: “Historians say.” Gotta love it when they bust that one out!)
The text of the Second Amendment reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The historical consensus is that, for most of American history, the amendment was understood to concern the use of guns in connection with militia service. The Founding Fathers were likely focused on keeping state militias from being disarmed, said Joseph Blocher, who specializes in the Second Amendment at Duke University’s law school.
“An individual’s right to use guns in self-defense is not expressly written in the Constitution,” said Reva Siegel, a law professor at Yale who has written prominent law review articles on the subject.
The interpretation that the Second Amendment extends to individuals’ rights to own guns only became mainstream in 2008, when the Supreme Court ruled in a landmark gun case, District of Columbia vs. Heller, that Americans have a constitutional right to own guns in their homes, knocking down the District’s handgun ban.
Advertisement

K.

Amazing in that it’s so deliciously predictable. You can set your watch by this stuff.

It’s, like, right there in the Second Amendment, Amber.

About as clear as it gets.

And just so fantastically on-brand.

Advertisement

That’s probably pretty accurate as to how journalism goes down at WaPo.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement