Wispy Woman: Dem Senate Hopeful James Talarico Says His Mysterious, Unseen Girlfriend Is...
Gov. Abigail Spanberger Fumes as SCOTUS Denies Democrat Party’s Virginia Redistricting Map...
FAFO in Tallahassee: Rep. Angie Nixon Arrested After Storming DeSantis’ Office
NYC’s Islamist Mayor Mamdani Honors ‘Nakba’ — When Arabs Tried and Failed to...
Long Overdue: Whistleblower Tina Peters Heading Home After Polis Halves Her Prison Term
US Delegation Dumps Every Chinese Gift, Badge, and Burner Phone Before Leaving Beijing
Sweet Vindication! Chris Rufo Provides Update on Hero Whistleblowers of Illegal Trans Surg...
Mayor Mamdani Rails Against Swastika — Then Goes Home to His October 7...
Grifting, Humorless Scolds: BLM Protests Kevin Hart's Roast Because There Was a George...
From Medicare for All to Free Primary Care for All: Why Dems Keep...
Norm Would Be So Proud: NBC News Worries About the 'Backlash' After Chinese...
'Drag Them'! Eric Trump Intends to Sue MS NOW and Jen Psaki for...
Obama Bro Ben 'Hamas' Rhodes Wonders Why Jews Are Mad About the 'Rape...
Big Apple First Lady’s Sour Playlist: 'Hungry But Sexy for Palestine' Loaded With...
Let's All Celebrate the 2-Year Anniversary of the Most Ill-Advised Debate Dare of...

The AP and Breaking911 had the exact same headline about FDA restricting J&J vaccine ... guess which one Twitter flagged as 'misleading'

In case you missed it, yesterday, the FDA put strict limits on who can get Johnson & Johnson’s COVID vaccine.

Advertisement

More from the AP:

FDA’s vaccine chief Dr. Peter Marks said the agency decided to restrict the vaccine after taking another look at the data on the risks of life-threatening blood clots and concluding that they are limited to J&J’s vaccine.

“If there’s an alternative that appears to be equally effective in preventing severe outcomes from COVID-19, we’d rather see people opting for that,” Marks said. “But we’ve been careful to say that– compared to no vaccine– this is still a better option.”

Under the new FDA instructions, J&J’s vaccine could still be given to people who had a severe allergic reaction to one of the other vaccines and can’t receive an additional dose. J&J’s shot could also be an option for people who refuse to receive the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, and therefore would otherwise remain unvaccinated, the agency said.

This is a pretty big deal, so it’s understandable that an account like @Breaking911 would cover it as well. And they did.

But their coverage was a little different from the AP’s. See if you can spot it.

Here’s the AP’s headline:

And here’s Breaking911’s headline:

See the difference yet? No? Well, clearly you’re not as discerning as Twitter, who saw a huge difference:

Clearly the AP’s tweet was acceptable as-is, but Breaking911’s was not. Wonder what that’s about.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/RBPundit/status/1522586360334401539

Almost. But they’d never do something like that, would they?

Some tweeters out there are actually defending Twitter’s selective “misleading” label by saying that Breaking911’s tweet lacked the context of the AP’s. But evidently Twitter couldn’t even buy that:

Baby steps.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement