Scott Jennings: Why CNN Covering Gaetz When Biden Just Commuted Prisoners’ Death Sentences...
Republican Releases Video Advocating Public Executions for Illegal Aliens Who Kill or Rape...
Fire on the Water: Fatal Florida Boat Explosion Captured on Video
Former President Bill Clinton Hospitalized For a Fever: X Speculates On the Possible...
Woman Says Canada Is a White Supremacist, Colonial Project Just Like Israel
NY Immigration Committee Asked for Official Help With Migrant Who Needs Bigger Home,...
Politico: Europe’s Far-Right 'Seizes' on Christmas Market Terror Attack
Cope Springs Eternal: Don Lemon and His Bluesky BlueAnons ‘Know’ Who’s Really in...
Hidden Numbers: When It Comes to Crime, Graphs Don’t Tell the Whole...
Joe Biden Just Made Trump's Deportation Case for Him
Mark Hamill Talks Blocking People, Dissolving the Electoral College, and the 'Orange Atroc...
So It Begins: Poll Shows Kamala Harris Leading JD Vance by One Point
LAWLESSNESS: Seattle Bus Driver the Latest Victim of Left's 'Criminal Justice Reform'
Here's One of the Democrat 'Bro Whisperers' Engaging Young Men
Video Shows Illegal Immigrant Fanning the Flames of Burning Woman

Here we go: Slate thinks it's time for a national conversation about 'the dangers of immunoprivilege'

It’s easy to confuse Slate with Salon.

Stuff like this is why:

Advertisement

More:

Vincent Nolte, 19th-century German immigrant and cotton merchant, made millions after he survived a bout of yellow fever and went on to prosper in New Orleans. As historian Kathryn Olivarius writes, Nolte benefited from “immunoprivilege”: Since he had made it through the sickness, he became credit-worthy and found himself accepted in elite society. His experience did not, however, endow him with much sympathy for his fellow victims of yellow fever. He believed both that God had blessed him and that he had saved himself, having “not at all fe[lt] like dying.”

Olivarius wrote about New Orleans’ 19th-century culture of immunoprivilege in the New York Times way back in April, when we didn’t yet know how complicated the question of coronavirus antibodies was going to be. Back then, some were floating the idea of asking young people to deliberately infect themselves with the coronavirus so they could, brimming in antibodies, spearhead the “reopening” of the economy. Reading Olivarius’ work—an article in the American Historical Review, her dissertation—in the more uncertain month of August, I felt a violent shock of recognition at the social phenomena she chronicles.

In New Orleans, Olivarius finds, elites refused to do anything at all about yellow fever for a hundred years. Theirs was a mindset of fatalism and cruelty that reinforced the society’s many human hierarchies; they saw yellow fever as a dangerous rite of passage that the truly worthy would come through. But poorer people who survived yellow fever were rewarded with the worst, most dangerous jobs; white people used Black people’s supposed “natural” resistance to yellow fever to justify the continuation of slavery. And the wealthy often turned profoundly hypocritical when it was their own families in danger. (That era’s elite fled to their summer houses too.)

Advertisement

Fitting that that piece was written by someone named Rebecca Onion, because it’s got the makings of a parody.

If only he’d checked his privilege.

Sure seems that way, doesn’t it?

We’re starting to wonder if there’s such a thing as “too much even for Slate.”

Snort.

But really. How is any of this sort of crap getting greenlit by Slate, or by any other ostensibly serious media outlet?

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement