NYT’s Pulitzer-Worthy Timing: Biden Border Catastrophe Revealed Safely After He’s Gone
The Diddy Documentary Is Brutal – Then You Meet the Daft Juror and...
Real Americans, Real Jobs, Real Results – Deportation Wave Hits Louisiana and Phones...
Utah’s ‘Republican’ Senator Wants You Hugging Immigrants Every Morning—No, Thank You
Tammy Duckworth Accuses Pete Hegseth of Murder & War Crimes… Then Admits She...
Per Scott Rasmussen, Voters Hold Blended Opinions of Socialism and Capitalism
'We Should All Be Alarmed': Bill Kristol and GOP Senators Are on Different...
Former DEA Deputy Chief Charged With Narcoterrorism in Cartel Money Laundering Scheme
Scott Jennings SO Drops the MIC on Axios for WHINING About the Right...
AWKWARD: Patty Murray BRUTALLY 'Introduced' to Illegal She's Been Defending and Fighting f...
THIS! JD Vance's Response When Asked Why He's Being SO CRUEL to Illegal...
Dear Democrats, If You Don't Like Trump's Narco-Boat Strategy, Take It Up With...
BAD Choice of Words: Eric Swalwell Could NOT Have Chosen a More Hilariously...
Epic Post Goes Straight-Up BIBLICAL Explaining Why the Left 'Always Wins' and What...
Lefty Law Student SCHOOLED in Thread for Using States Like WY to Blame...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement