Ro Khanna Pivots From LA Mayoral Race and Democrat Incumbents to Trump and...
Sexting Scandal Just Got Worse: Platner Team Threatened Former Staffer Then Tried to...
Larry Elder Nails Analogous Response to Fox News Headline Screengrab
'WOKE OVERLOAD': Rashida Tlaib Says Women Having Periods Equals Economic Violence and I...
Black Democrat SHREDS Jon Favreau for Defending Platner 'Cuz 'He's a White Man'...
His FACE! LOL! WATCH Democrat Andy Kim Duck, Dodge, and DIVE During CNN...
Dems Are Twisting Themselves Into DESPERATE Pretzels Defending Platner, HERE Are Some of...
What I Read About Platner's Wife AFTER She Defended Her Scumbag Husband Makes...
Just INSANELY Creepy: GUESS Which Democrat Thought Posting His Texts With a 13-YEAR-OLD...
HA! NO WAY? Forget Nazi Tat, Cheering Troops' Deaths & Sexting: THIS May...
STUNNER: Graham Platner STILL Maintains Creepy, Sexually Suggestive Profile on 'Predator's...
Think Graham Platner's Sexting Is Bad? Look at This Creepy Facebook Page, 'Cuz...
Former WaPo Editor Lois Romano Runs Cover for Graham Platner’s Lewd Sexts, Then...
Spencer Pratt Says He Ran for Office Out of Desperation and Necessity, Debating...
Ro Khanna Says Voting for the Laken Riley Act is Disqualifying for Any...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement