Here's What the Biden WH Is Touting As 'Campaign Rallies' (Beverage Warning)
YIKES: Leaked Video Shows Biden's 'Spontaneous' WaWa Visit Was Scripted DOWN to Cashier's...
*SNORT* Nancy Pelosi's Book Release Announced and Twitter Has SO Much Fun (at...
For Once I Actually Believe Something Biden Said (There's a First Time for...
We Can Take a Guess: Israel Unsure Why Pentagon Leaked Info on Iran...
Hawley Lights a Fire Under Mayorkas, Leaves Him Sweating After Fiery Exchange
Riley Gaines Calls Biden Out for 'Officially Abolishing Title IX As We Know...
AOC RAGES at Barnard and Columbia for Suspending Pro-Hamas Protesters and X Just...
*EYE ROLL* Sheldon Whitehouse DRAGGED for Thread Defending Dems Rejecting Mayorkas Impeach...
WH Adviser Says Biden Will Make Sure Gas Prices 'Remain Affordable' (Yeah, About...
Rand Paul Rips Mayorkas to Shreds During Tense Questioning
Oh Honey, NO: Joy Behar Tries to Claim That Biden Cares MORE About...
Meet the Canadian Katherine Maher: Head of CBC Is EXACTLY As Deranged a...
Monopoly on DERP: Elizabeth Warren Sounds Off on Apple iPhone and Gets Blasted
Protesters Say Dexter Reed Was Shot, Assassinated, and Overly-Killed

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement