Cameron Kasky ‘Retracts’ His ‘Accidental’ Twice-Told Trump Global Sex-Trafficking Ring Lie...
Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s Hardcore Leftist Reveal Proves There Are No Moderate De...
Minnesota Trans Rep. Leigh Finke Demands Escalation: Keep Storming Churches to Force ICE...
Professional Agitator William Kelly Again Dares AG Pam Bondi to Charge Him
Touch Grass, Dude ... Bill Madden Thinks Usha Vance's Baby Is a Distraction...
Dem Strategist Tells CNN GOP Are the Same People Who Opened Fire Hydrants...
Steeped in Scripture, Sick of Sellouts: A Christian Response to Pastors Who Equate...
ICE Agent Refuses to Show Warrant to Lib Because 'You're a Nobody'
New NJ Gov. Mikie Sherrill Compares ICE to British Standing Armies in Colonial...
Set-Up? Unhinged NPR Intern Punches, Pepper-Sprays Independent Journalist on Philly Bus
Terrifying: Licensed Ohio Nurse in Charge of Home Care Wishes Severe Harm on...
Keith Ellison Proves to Don Lemon He Doesn’t Know What the FACE Act...
The View’s Slavery Claim Got My Attention — So I Dug Into the...
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Cites the Black Codes as Constitutional in Gun Control...
Celebrating One Year of Trump's Second Term: VIP Flash Sale!

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement