Maggie Vs. MAGA: Director’s Severe TDS Led to Massive Box Office Bomb With...
Nicholas Kristof Considers Alternative Theory for Decline in Iranian Missile Launches
Brave Hero Marine Leaves Hospital, Poses for Photo With Palestinian Flag
Hysterical: Women Led in Group Screaming Session for International Women’s Day Protest
Voice Actor for Halo's Master Chief Demands White House Remove Him From 'Disgusting...
Mamdani’s Wife: Actually Born in Houston, Rebranded as 'From Damascus' for the Instagram...
Rosie O’Donnell Appears on Jim Acosta’s Podcast to Prove They’re Two Different People
Kai Trump 'Out of Touch' for ... Grocery Shopping? The Left's Hypocritical Pile-On...
James Talarico Has Met So Many Non-Christians Who Are More Christ-Like Than His...
NYT Updates Its 'Smoking Jars of Metal and Fuses' Headline in Wake of...
Revenge of the Radicalized Rich Kid: Bucks County Brat Bombs Protest, Flashes ISIS...
Aaron Rupar: Often a Liar, Now Just Oblivious to How Obama's 'Optimism' Turned...
David French Fanboying Over Abortion-Supporting, Trans-Loving 'CHRISTIAN' Dem James Talari...
No Wonder They're Seething: Teen Bomber's Family Lives Large in Luxury While He...
Mamdani Panics As Live NYC Press Conference Goes Horribly Wrong

NYT executive editor Dean Baquet's pathetic attempt at headline damage control still won't be enough for the Outrage Mob

As Twitchy told you, the New York Times caved to the mob and changed a headline that wasn’t sufficiently harsh on Donald Trump:

Advertisement

Evidently the potential loss of Joan Walsh and Beto O’Rourke as subscribers was just too high a price to pay for a straightforward and accurate headline about Trump’s remarks. New York Times’ executive editor Dean Baquet is still out there trying to do damage control:

Really dodged a bullet.

More from the Daily Beast:

It was written on deadline and when it was passed along for approval we all saw it was a bad headline and changed it pretty quickly,” Baquet texted The Daily Beast on Tuesday morning as critics continued to vent their outrage on social media.

Baquet, for his part, texted: “I understand the concern people have. Headlines matter. But I hope they read the coverage, which I will argue was strong.”

If they had read the coverage, they would’ve seen that it was hardly the egregious pro-Trump lovefest they had made it out to be:

Advertisement

All the same, though, the New York Times will have to tread lightly going forward. They wouldn’t want to get busted for another horrific “error”:

Baquet declined to respond on the record to questions concerning how this error specifically occurred, how the Times will avoid such mistakes in the future, and various critics’ claims that this is only the latest in a series of missteps in the paper’s political and Trump-world coverage.

Oh well. At least in trying to make excuses for a headline that never should’ve been controversial in the first place, Baquet is ensuring that the mob will respect the New York Times going forward.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement