Viewers Heed Brian Stelter’s Advice and Hold Two CNN Anchors to Account With...
Forbes: Canadian Singer Doesn't Outright Deny MAGA Association
Mehdi Hasan Reminds Ron DeSantis That 90,000 Floridians Died During the COVID Crisis
These 'Republican Moms' Are All Voting for James Talarico: 'I Find Him to...
Francesca Hong Notes Her Proximity to Whiteness Continues Through Her Half-White Son
Jezebel: ‘MAGA Barbie’ Sophie Cunningham Working to Be WNBA’s Worst Player
LIVE Election Results on Twitchy: Primary Night in MI, MO, VA, KS, and...
A Very Masculine James Talarico Wields a 'Blowtorch'
Rage Return?: Politico ‘Journo’ Declared COVID Damage Repaired Until Fauci Forced to Testi...
Drama Queen Gavin Newsom Declares Congress Dead, Democracy Over If Dems Don't Win
Bring in the Bulldozers: Madison and State Police Dismantle Black Lives Matter Encampment
Mamdani Gets Caught As Grocery ID Policy Backfires
Welcome to the Party, Pal: Mark Halperin Suddenly Notices a TEENY Bit of...
This Alone, This Right Here Should Be Disqualifying for Francesca Hong... Sadly, Commies...
Ok, HAMAS: Ben Rhodes Shrieks About AIPAC (the Jews!) in Thread Pushing Abdul...

Talk about problematic! Carlos Maza's reaping the whirlwind and crying foul after being forced to play by his own rules

Despite unveiling their latest set of hard-and-fast safety guidelines, Twitter still doesn’t seem to have taken any action to deplatform serial guideline violator Carlos Maza. Apparently his calls for violence aren’t enough to land him on their radar. Will this?

Advertisement

Oh, my.

We’re very curious. Because what it sounds like is hate speech. We know hate speech hasn’t been clearly defined by anyone yet, but we’re pretty sure that tweet is probably definitely hate speech.

Well, things were different back in 2014. Now that safety is Twitter’s top priority, though, they should really get on Maza already. His tweet was literally indefensible.

Advertisement

That’s great that he was defending you, Hannah, but as we all know, when it comes to policing alleged “hate speech,” context doesn’t matter.

He engaged in behavior that disrupted our experience on Twitter. Because we said so. Yes, that rule is vague, but we feel like it applies here. Because we said so.

Sorry, Carlos, we couldn’t hear you over the sound of our tiny violins.

Advertisement

We all know that Carlos doesn’t like to give people the benefit of the doubt before calling for them to be deplatformed … so why should we cut him slack on this?

https://twitter.com/bob_malak/status/1136718535030296576

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement