Kamala Harris Says She and Biden Didn’t Release Epstein Files to Avoid Appearance...
Based on These Congressional Numbers From CNN the Dems Should DEFINITELY Keep Up...
Poor Choice of Words, Dave. LOL! David Axelrod Says AOC Has Something You...
No Monopoly on Grift: Haitians Give Somalis a Run for Their (Stolen) Money...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Innocent People DON'T Do This --> Whistleblowers Blow the Whistle AGAIN on Tim...
City in England Installs HVMs (Guess What That Stands for) in Effort to...
REALLY? Jon Karl Can't Remember a Primetime Presidential Speech That Was Hyperpartisan As...
Soros-Backed DA Drops Charges on Alleged Attempted Killer—He 'Finishes the Job' 24 Hours...
CNN Was Forced to Report Trump's Inflation Win, and It Was Glorious
NEWLY Released Radio Transmissions Show LEO Gave Brown University Shooter Lots of Time...
Chuck Schumer's Predictable Spin on Trump's Speech Gets Reality Nuked and Ratioed
Journo Claiming His Rent 'Went Up 24% Under Trump' BOLTS After Richard Grenell...
Britain's Plan to 'Protect Women' Targets Young White Boys Instead of Migrants Doing...
'Un Freakin' Real': Dem Rep's Argument Against Deporting Illegals Is PEAK Left Insanity

Talk about problematic! Carlos Maza's reaping the whirlwind and crying foul after being forced to play by his own rules

Despite unveiling their latest set of hard-and-fast safety guidelines, Twitter still doesn’t seem to have taken any action to deplatform serial guideline violator Carlos Maza. Apparently his calls for violence aren’t enough to land him on their radar. Will this?

Advertisement

Oh, my.

We’re very curious. Because what it sounds like is hate speech. We know hate speech hasn’t been clearly defined by anyone yet, but we’re pretty sure that tweet is probably definitely hate speech.

Well, things were different back in 2014. Now that safety is Twitter’s top priority, though, they should really get on Maza already. His tweet was literally indefensible.

Advertisement

That’s great that he was defending you, Hannah, but as we all know, when it comes to policing alleged “hate speech,” context doesn’t matter.

He engaged in behavior that disrupted our experience on Twitter. Because we said so. Yes, that rule is vague, but we feel like it applies here. Because we said so.

Sorry, Carlos, we couldn’t hear you over the sound of our tiny violins.

Advertisement

We all know that Carlos doesn’t like to give people the benefit of the doubt before calling for them to be deplatformed … so why should we cut him slack on this?

https://twitter.com/bob_malak/status/1136718535030296576

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos