Pelley Wanna Crack-Up? 60 Minutes Host Says Guests Won’t Appear on Show Due...
NBC 'News' Breaks Story on Trump's Racist Font War
Get on the Jet Ski, Gavvy Pooh: Nicki Minaj Just Destroyed Gavin Newsom...
Amanda Seyfried Says Socialism Is a Gorgeous Idea Because She’ll Never Actually Have...
Mollie Hemingway's Wake-Up Call: Ilhan Omar's Alleged Brother-Marriage and Fraud Must Be I...
Sorry, but Your Early Retirement Isn’t My Emergency: The Subsidy Cliff Truth Bomb
Chickens Roost at Aisle 7: Jill Filipovic Stunned to Learn Soft-on-Crime Policies Have...
Obama’s ‘Most Transparent Ever’ Scam: No Library, Just a Private ‘Center’ to Hide...
Socialist LA Councilwoman Rakes in $240K to Oversee Fentanyl Hellhole: No-Shows Debates As...
Minnesota Journo: If Brother-Marriage Claim Is Libel, Ilhan Omar Should Sue and Cash...
Walking Schtick: Cane-Waving Al Green’s Trump Impeachment Stunt Fails (Again) but Other De...
Governor Tim Walz Is Asked About Responsibility for Somali Fraud Scandal and Pivots...
Scott Jennings Spots Insanity and Madness in What Happened After ICE Released Abrego...
Bennie’s Benefactor: CNN Host Saves Dem Thompson From His National Guard ‘Unfortunate Acci...
FOILED AGAIN! Dems Drop What They Call a 'Disturbing Pic' of Trump From...

'This is super gross': Slate writer torched for her 'offensively terrible' take on Pete Buttigieg's white male gayness

We already know that gay conservatives aren’t allowed to be a thing. But according to Slate’s Christina Cauterucci, for one, gay liberals can be problematic as well. If they’re white males, that is. According to Cauterucci, it’s great that Pete Buttigieg is gay and all, but the fact that he’s an educated white male ultimately means he’s the wrong kind of gay:

Advertisement

Here’s Cauterucci’s definitive conclusion:

To me, a queer woman, it seems hard to argue that the presidential run of this apotheosis of respectability politics is a major win for diversity. Buttigieg’s perception of queer sexuality as a not-sinful but ultimately unimportant distinction—“like having brown hair,” his coming-out essay said—doesn’t make him less gay. It does, however, put some distance between him and the queer communities he’s getting credit for being the first to represent. And if I’m being cynical (or just honest), it probably makes him more electable.

Straight white male voters will likely find it easier to see themselves in Buttigieg than in the women or people of color in the 2020 field. They’ll be right to do so: Buttigieg’s life experiences—how he’s been perceived, how he’s gotten paid, what he’s believed himself capable of, what opportunities have been available to him—almost certainly have far more in common with those of Sanders and Biden than those of Harris, Booker, and Warren. That’s not to say he won’t face challenges and stereotypes specific to his sexuality, or that he hasn’t overcome obstacles he’s chosen not to share. Homophobia still exists. As Buttigieg has correctly pointed out in town halls and interviews, LGBTQ people can still legally be fired for the mere fact of their identity in most U.S. states. But in a primary for the overwhelmingly pro-gay Democratic Party, Buttigieg can be more accurately lumped in with his white male peers than with anyone else.

Advertisement

Heh.

Absolutely nothing. But there’s definitely something wrong with Cauterucci’s take, which is why she’s taking heat from all sides:

Advertisement

Ain’t identity politics grand?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement