LAWLESSNESS: Seattle Bus Driver the Latest Victim of Left's 'Criminal Justice Reform'
Here's One of the Democrat 'Bro Whisperers' Engaging Young Men
Video Shows Illegal Immigrant Fanning the Flames of Burning Woman
Merry Terfmas! J.K. Rowling Wraps Up 2024 by Celebrating 'Vibe Shift' Over Trans...
Newly Obtained Photos Show Joe Biden Introducing Hunter to Xi Jinping
Rand Paul's Annual Festivus List Highlights Over ONE TRILLION (With a T) in...
REALLY?! ACLU Files Suit on Behalf of 'Trans' FL Prisoners for Taxpayer-Funded Makeup,...
Damage Control! Biden's X Account Spins Deplorable Death Row Commutations and HOO BOY...
REWIND: FIFTY Years Ago, Ronald Reagan Chatted With Johnny Carson About Taxes, Government...
The Science President: Trump Vows to Make Two Genders the Official Policy of...
'DHS Is Complicit in Trafficking': Katie Pavlich Shreds ANOTHER PolitiFact Ruling That's A...
WI Children’s Hospital Rejected Christmas Toy Donations Because of ‘Religious’ Org Name (T...
Run Forrest, RUN! WATCH AOC Try and Escape Nick Sotor Asking Her to...
NYU History Prof and MSNBC Guest Deletes Post Whining About Scalia Giving Trump...
'60 Minutes' Pushes Gun Control by Praising Mexico's Lone Gun Store, Trips Over...

TOLERANCE! Jason Alexander envisions NASTY fate for climate change heretic Scott Pruitt

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt committed climate change heresy when he had the gall — the gall! — to suggest that climate change isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Advertisement

A breathless Nick Visser writes at the HuffPost:

Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, alluded earlier this week that global warming may be beneficial to humans, once again questioning the world’s leading scientists who have declared the phenomenon one of the greatest known threats to humanity.

In an interview that aired Tuesday on KSNV, a Nevada television station, Pruitt questioned how accurately scientists could predict the planet’s ideal temperature in 2100, or even this year, and said humans had “flourished” in times of past warmth.

“We know humans have most flourished during times of what, warming trends,” Pruitt said during the interview. “I think there’s assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing. Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100, in the year 2018?”

He continued: “That’s fairly arrogant for us to think that we know exactly what it should be in 2100.”

How dare Pruitt point out that climate change is anything but a new phenomenon or suggest that humans don’t have all the answers! The Democrats are just beside themselves with shock and disgust:

Advertisement

Jason Alexander isn’t too pleased, either:

Because tolerance.

Heh.

https://twitter.com/byronic_queero/status/961672660508819456

Or latex sales.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement