Targeted, Ignored, Spun: How the Media Failed a Nation After a Weekend of...
Michigan Professor Faceplants While Trying to Dunk on Thoughts and Prayers After Bondi...
Tara Palmeri Claims President Whose Cabinet Is 1/3 Women Does Not Value Women
FBI Announces Arrests In NYE Mass Casualty Plot From a Terror Group With...
Just How Connected Were Top MN Dems to the Somali Fraud? THIS Connected...
Terror Attack Thwarted: FBI Announcement As Violence Erupts Worldwide
NEW Evidence Shows Obama's DOJ (Including James Comey) Did Some HEAVY Lifting to...
House Oversight Has a Damning Report About DC Fudging Crime Stats (How Many...
WOW: John Kennedy Reads From MN AG's Office Internal Memo About WHY They...
Maria Bartiromo Made Dem Rep. Ro Khanna Squirm After He Said 'I've Never...
Wajahat Ali Rages at The New York Times for Being HONEST About Bondi...
Australia PM's Proposal After Terrorist Attack Couldn't Be More Predictable (US Dems Are...
Side-by-Side Screenshots Show the Difference Between the Evil Right and Tolerant Left Afte...
Jeremy London Warns That MAGA Will Cheer Reiner's Death, Trips SPECTACULARLY on His...
Ms. Rachel's Crocodile Tears: Shocked by Antisemitism After Years of Fueling It

TOLERANCE! Jason Alexander envisions NASTY fate for climate change heretic Scott Pruitt

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt committed climate change heresy when he had the gall — the gall! — to suggest that climate change isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Advertisement

A breathless Nick Visser writes at the HuffPost:

Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, alluded earlier this week that global warming may be beneficial to humans, once again questioning the world’s leading scientists who have declared the phenomenon one of the greatest known threats to humanity.

In an interview that aired Tuesday on KSNV, a Nevada television station, Pruitt questioned how accurately scientists could predict the planet’s ideal temperature in 2100, or even this year, and said humans had “flourished” in times of past warmth.

“We know humans have most flourished during times of what, warming trends,” Pruitt said during the interview. “I think there’s assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing. Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100, in the year 2018?”

He continued: “That’s fairly arrogant for us to think that we know exactly what it should be in 2100.”

How dare Pruitt point out that climate change is anything but a new phenomenon or suggest that humans don’t have all the answers! The Democrats are just beside themselves with shock and disgust:

Advertisement

Jason Alexander isn’t too pleased, either:

Because tolerance.

Heh.

https://twitter.com/byronic_queero/status/961672660508819456

Or latex sales.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement