Cringe! Columbia 'Revolutionaries' Want Their Meals Catered or Else
Here's Some Feel-Good Footage of Encampments Being Cleared in Texas
WATCH: El Salvador Pres Has AG Investigate Executive Branch for Bribery
Blinding Ignorance: University of Chicago Surgeon and Professor 'Proud' of Pro-Hamas Prote...
Fantastic News: NHS Declares Sex a Biological FACT, Bans Men From Women's Hospital...
Native Council Approves Student Demonstrators Occupying Their Land for Protest
SO WHAT? BBC Gets Community Note Treatment for Pointing Out Train Drivers Are...
Pelosi Gets Pissed, Morning Joe Meltdown, Minorities Turn on Kamala!
News to Us: Donald Trump Wants to Track Your Menstrual Cycles
Resident Congressional Fire Alarm Delinquent Jamaal Bowman Sides with Pro Hamas Columbia P...
Down the Drain: After Billions in U.S. Aid, Ukraine Army Chief Says Tactical...
Massive Corporations Are Using Government to Eliminate Credit Card Rewards (Sponsored)
Northwestern Announces Full-Ride Scholarships for Palestinian Students
Coleman Hughes Offers Thoughtful Reflection on Columbia Protests and Free Speech
Birds of a Feather: Obama Buddy Bill Ayers Supporting Chaos at University of...

'Misleading and dishonest pattern': Brit Hume shares WaPo piece (yes, WAPO!) that takes Rachel Maddow APART (and damn)

Rachel Maddow really really really wanted that whole Russian collusion thing to be real.

She also really really really thought she had a bombshell in Trump’s tax returns …

Advertisement

In other words, she really really really has had a BAD few years of doing the whole ‘pundit’ thing.

Seriously, when even WaPo is writing pieces about how crappy of a job she’s done? Brit Hume thought enough of the piece to share it so you KNOW we’ve gotta share it too.

From the Washington Post:

The case against Maddow is far stronger. When small bits of news arose in favor of the dossier, the franchise MSNBC host pumped air into them. At least some of her many fans surely came away from her broadcasts thinking the dossier was a serious piece of investigative research, not the flimflam, quick-twitch game of telephone outlined in the Horowitz report. She seemed to be rooting for the document.

And when large bits of news arose against the dossier, Maddow found other topics more compelling.

She was there for the bunkings, absent for the debunkings — a pattern of misleading and dishonest asymmetry.

WaPo.

Wow.

Ouch, Rachel.

Hilarious, right?!

SOOOOO bad. If you read through this thread you’ll find lots and lots of people claiming that not only has the dossier been verified BUT it’s being used to impeach Trump.

C’mon, we’re not dealing with the brightest crayons in the box, folks.

#Evergreen

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement