Dense, Repeat: Nero Newsom Takes His Wildfire PR Battle to MSNBC Instead of...
Sen. Angus King Says Pete Hegseth's Position Is That Torture Is OK
Nate Silver Wonders When the Pendulum Will Swing Back Toward Liberals
Scott Jennings: Democrats Sent Their Dumbest Members and They Didn’t Land a Glove...
Democrat Mark Kelly Has Positive Words for Pete Hegseth on Policy but Will...
Rep. AOC Goes on Rant About Women Bleeding Out in Parking Lots Across...
UMass Scandal: American Tax Dollars Fund App for Trans Sex Workers in Thailand,...
NYT Pentagon Correspondent 'Fact-Checks' Pete Hegseth on Racism in the Military
TikTok Ban Imminent: Users Defiantly Flood to More Chinese Apps in Massive Protest
California State Sen. Scott Wiener Adds Wildfire Proposals to Senate's 'Trump-Proofing' Bi...
FL Legislators: Backstabbing Trump and Desantis Because Who Needs Loyalty When You've Got...
New House Bill Would Take Pedophiles Off the Streets 'Permanently'
Center Rage: Pete Hegseth Gets Earful of Screeching Senatorial Stupidity from Four Sides...
Pete Hegseth Tells Senators About the Glut of Four-Star Generals
Congress Must Go Scorched Earth (Pun Intended) on California Disaster Aid

'Misleading and dishonest pattern': Brit Hume shares WaPo piece (yes, WAPO!) that takes Rachel Maddow APART (and damn)

Rachel Maddow really really really wanted that whole Russian collusion thing to be real.

She also really really really thought she had a bombshell in Trump’s tax returns …

Advertisement

In other words, she really really really has had a BAD few years of doing the whole ‘pundit’ thing.

Seriously, when even WaPo is writing pieces about how crappy of a job she’s done? Brit Hume thought enough of the piece to share it so you KNOW we’ve gotta share it too.

From the Washington Post:

The case against Maddow is far stronger. When small bits of news arose in favor of the dossier, the franchise MSNBC host pumped air into them. At least some of her many fans surely came away from her broadcasts thinking the dossier was a serious piece of investigative research, not the flimflam, quick-twitch game of telephone outlined in the Horowitz report. She seemed to be rooting for the document.

And when large bits of news arose against the dossier, Maddow found other topics more compelling.

She was there for the bunkings, absent for the debunkings — a pattern of misleading and dishonest asymmetry.

WaPo.

Wow.

Ouch, Rachel.

Hilarious, right?!

SOOOOO bad. If you read through this thread you’ll find lots and lots of people claiming that not only has the dossier been verified BUT it’s being used to impeach Trump.

C’mon, we’re not dealing with the brightest crayons in the box, folks.

#Evergreen

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement