Nothing quite like seeing a ‘historian’ make a total fool of himself talking about not only history, but RECENT history. Mike Stuchbery (who we’d never heard of before now) doesn’t seem to think evil men can do as much evil with trucks and knives as they can with a gun.
Really, really hard to kill 50, injure 500 with a knife, or even a truck. Pitifully easy with a semiautomatic rifle. https://t.co/rDuVGlgKWE
— Mike Stuchbery ?? (@MikeStuchbery_) October 2, 2017
Really, really hard huh? Gosh, didn’t seem so hard for the terrorist bastard in Nice in July of last year:
Absolute dunce. pic.twitter.com/75NMWBD7CY
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) October 4, 2017
And they wonder why they NEVER win the gun debate.
Find out how many truck attacks have there been in the last five years, versus mass shootings. Get back to me. https://t.co/e3yUrlrYP0
— Mike Stuchbery ?? (@MikeStuchbery_) October 4, 2017
Still wrong.
If the truck had a silencer…
— Rich Weinstein (@phillyrich1) October 4, 2017
Don’t give these folks any ideas, they already think black guns are deadlier than brown guns. We wouldn’t put it past them to think you can find silencers for trucks or start pushing truck control.
An encore for the worst "historian" on Twitter. pic.twitter.com/TCs54n0Nkf
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) October 4, 2017
Smug, wrong and snide is no way to go through life, Mike.
Related:
Now do CHICAGO: CNN may have written the dumbest op-ed YET about white men and guns
OOPSIE: J.K. Rowling defends Islam and ACCIDENTALLY destroys her own gun control argument
Join the conversation as a VIP Member