It would seem Ben Rhodes is more concerned about Trump hurting the mayor of London’s feeling than he is about the actual terror attack on London Bridge. Trump is not alone in his criticism of Mayor Sadiq Khan, who has all but surrendered to the notion that terrorism is just something his city will have to get used to.
That’s not leadership.
Imagine FDR attacking Churchill for being resilient in the face of the bombing of London. https://t.co/VfqZWj0CBp
— Ben Rhodes (@brhodes) June 4, 2017
What? Churchill wasn’t the mayor of London.
History much?
https://twitter.com/politicalelle/status/871508733133639680
Exactly. Churchill would have been calling for an ass-kicking; the notion that we should for whatever reason accept terror in any way would have offended him.
.brhodes ~ Imagine if you knew history and knew Churchill was not the "Mayor" of London #ApplesAndOranges
— Sandy 〽️ (@RightGlockMom) June 4, 2017
Word.
https://twitter.com/BrowningMachine/status/871536197666865152
Imagine.
*snort*
https://twitter.com/themanfronUNCLE/status/871482828869042176
Indeed.
Imagine an Obama toady siding with Islamist apologists.
— Dusty (@dustopian) June 4, 2017
https://twitter.com/JudgeJanna/status/871544164864983041
Ben will just convince himself that anyone who disagrees with his tweet is too stupid to know better … it’s what progressives do.
Yeah, well, Churchill wasn't a quisling mayor of London now was he?
— Jim (@Ifitsthisname) June 5, 2017
Odds are Churchill wouldn’t have been a Kahn fan, especially his nonchalant attitude toward protecting his people from terrorism.
https://twitter.com/RepRepublic/status/871478164609839104
We could play this ‘imagine history changed’ game all day, but we’re pretty sure Ben wouldn’t like it.
Related:
Fahoo fores? Jodi Picoult compares ISIS to the Grinch, is mocked SO badly she deletes tweet https://t.co/3KEN0mhzn2
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) June 5, 2017
Join the conversation as a VIP Member