Walk away! Charles C.W. Cooke's response to woman lecturing him on conservative sources is HILARIOUS

Every once in a while Twitter is just flat out entertaining.

Like this exchange between Charles C. W. Cooke (the EDITOR of National Review Online) and a woman who probably should have read his bio before engaging:

I’ve yet to read a single positive analysis of the House’s Obamacare bill.

— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) March 7, 2017

https://twitter.com/MAcatholicmom/status/839093440004648964

I’m the editor of National Review Online. https://t.co/1RbcoCl1Bb

— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) March 7, 2017

OOPS. She meant that OTHER conservative source … yeah, that one.

I LOL'd.

— Michelle Ray (@GaltsGirl) March 7, 2017

We did too.

pic.twitter.com/oSa7MoIwIi

— This Won’t End Well. (@sirvitup) March 7, 2017

Clearly she DIDN’T know who she was talking to.

https://twitter.com/MAcatholicmom/status/839094655946002433

She came back and said it was sarcasm.

Maybe.

But you know that face you make when watching someone do something is painful even for you? You shrink your head back, scrunch up the middle of your face and pout your lips a little?

Recommended

Skin Grifting: Texas Democrat Jolanda Jones Says James Talarico Needs to Pay Blacks for Their Votes

Warren Squire

Advertisement

Yeah, we made that face.

https://twitter.com/ajdomanico/status/839096392811429888

This. ^

this is a good own and just one of the reasons people on Twitter are the worst. The bio is right. there.

— Olivia Messer ? (@OliviaMesser) March 7, 2017

Helpful hint: Always read a bio before engaging … trust us on this one.

pic.twitter.com/djL0SlEf1r

— Harriet Baldwin ?? (@HarrietBaldwin) March 7, 2017

TrumpCare rollout going smoothly… pic.twitter.com/Axa7TRoxyW

— Matt McDermott (@mattmfm) March 7, 2017

Heh!