Gosh, is it just us or does the timing around the New York Times’ breaking news about John Bolton’s unpublished manuscript seem sort of convenient? Anyone else have a sense of deja vu? Like we’ve seen this ploy before?
Seems Brit Hume does:
This came along right about on schedule. https://t.co/cSXZDVKpNB
— Brit Hume (@brithume) January 27, 2020
It feels like Trump is being ‘Kavanaugh’d’.
Yeah, but I assume they'll try to have something that seems better for Tuesday or so.
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) January 27, 2020
This was the Julie Swetnick of impeachment bombshells
— Stephe96 (@Stephe96) January 27, 2020
Paging Michael Avenatti.
This is the Kavanaugh model of last minute “evidence” appearing to force the weaker GOP Senators to side with Democrats. Don’t fall for this @SenateGOP
— Phillip May (@pharvey2001) January 27, 2020
"Breaking News" = "News we strategically withheld then released on a specific date in order to achieve a desired political objective" #journalism
— Pundit Planet (@punditfap) January 27, 2020
Any minute now they’ll release a bunch of texts from John Bolton’s college buddies that prove Trump totally bribed Ukraine … wait, we’re getting our media hoaxes confused.
I can only imagine how out of control the Democrats will be with Trump for four more years.
— Pooka Luck (@MuchLuck) January 27, 2020
It’s almost as though @nytimes is colluding. With the Democrats.
— Not Sure (@mr233) January 27, 2020
An unpublished manuscript that only “anonymous sources” have seen… ?
— Chris Rutledge (@chrismrutledge) January 27, 2020
Getting real old.
— Philip Cahalin (@PhilipCahalin) January 27, 2020
It really, really, REALLY is.
Democrats say thanks, NYT.
To change your comments display name, click here.