Rachel Maddow really really really wanted that whole Russian collusion thing to be real.
She also really really really thought she had a bombshell in Trump’s tax returns …
In other words, she really really really has had a BAD few years of doing the whole ‘pundit’ thing.
Seriously, when even WaPo is writing pieces about how crappy of a job she’s done? Brit Hume thought enough of the piece to share it so you KNOW we’ve gotta share it too.
This is withering, yet to this day there are people claiming the dossier has mostly been verified. It has not. https://t.co/sw6n2tnr4F
— Brit Hume (@brithume) December 26, 2019
From the Washington Post:
😂😂😂😂 All of a sudden WaPo is the voice of reason. 😂😂😂😂
— Trump 2020 Buckeye (@NerkBuckeye) December 26, 2019
Not only has the "non-public source info" not been verified, as Horowitz pointed out over dozens of pages at different points in his report, large segments of the most significant claims have been undermined by the actual sources that Steele claimed to rely upon.
— shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) December 26, 2019
— joboo (@infidelinwisco) December 26, 2019
The only thing that has been “verified”, Dossier was spelled correctly
— warren ancheta (@warrenancheta3) December 26, 2019
Pretending MSNBC Maddow is a news program is like pretending Professional Wrestling is a sporting event.
— Peter Tomfohrde (@p_tom40) December 27, 2019
They want to believe in it so bad.
— Tegridy! (@cjackson65) December 26, 2019
SOOOOO bad. If you read through this thread you’ll find lots and lots of people claiming that not only has the dossier been verified BUT it’s being used to impeach Trump.
C’mon, we’re not dealing with the brightest crayons in the box, folks.
When you've spent all this time and money on a good Hoax,
you just don't discard it because it isn't true.
— Angie (@haylexi) December 26, 2019
Can’t believe a word she says.
— judy small (@Judyap22) December 26, 2019