Another day, another shocking revelation not only about the Russian collusion hoax but about the Mueller narrative itself.
You’d think by now none of this would surprise any of us but boy howdy, this is ‘surprising’.
Key figure that Mueller linked to Russia intel was actually a State Department source https://t.co/eEmun5ldwp
— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) June 7, 2019
From The Hill:
The incomplete portrayal of Kilimnik is so important to Mueller’s overall narrative that it is raised in the opening of his report. “The FBI assesses” Kilimnik “to have ties to Russian intelligence,” Mueller’s team wrote on page 6, putting a sinister light on every contact Kilimnik had with Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman.
What it doesn’t state is that Kilimnik was a “sensitive” intelligence source for State going back to at least 2013 while he was still working for Manafort, according to FBI and State Department memos I reviewed.
Kilimnik was not just any run-of-the-mill source, either.
He interacted with the chief political officer at the U.S. Embassy in Kiev, sometimes meeting several times a week to provide information on the Ukraine government. He relayed messages back to Ukraine’s leaders and delivered written reports to U.S. officials via emails that stretched on for thousands of words, the memos show.
The FBI knew all of this, well before the Mueller investigation concluded.
A State Dept. informant.
Now, why would Mueller have left THIS out?
The revelation that Kilimnik was a valued State Dept informant, & that Mueller excluded that from his report, is one of the most embarrassing episodes yet for the Russiagate conspiracy theory narrative (and that’s saying a lot). https://t.co/hrSpq6Ry4l
— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) June 7, 2019
'So Kilimnik's delivery of the peace plan to the Trump campaign in August 2016 was flagged by Mueller as potentially nefarious, but its earlier delivery to the Obama administration wasn't mentioned. That's what many in the intelligence world might call "deception by omission."'
— (((Richard Drake))) (@rdrake98) June 7, 2019
Something like that.
#Mueller lied about the role of the only person they ever suggested was a Russian spy: "hundreds of pages of government documents which special counsel Robert Mueller possessed since 2018 describe Kilimnik as a “sensitive” intelligence source for the U.S." https://t.co/r6ag3luOuF
— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) June 7, 2019
I wonder if we'll see an in depth analysis of this on @MaddowBlog
Seems like something @maddow would be interested in.
Oh, wait…. no. It would hurt her 2 year narrative, so we'll hear nothing about it.https://t.co/ifVZyNDCKr
— BonkPolitics (@BonkPolitics) June 7, 2019
The Mueller Report was one big fat stinking pile of Lies by Omission
— Whotnaught (@whotnaught) June 7, 2019
There are so many moving parts here … it’s insane.
Deception by omission. On multiple fronts.
It’s becoming clear that he must be placed under oath and made to testify.
— ?Thinkologist⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@ChelEarle) June 7, 2019
Democrats keep talking about it but we’re not entirely sure they’ll want Mueller under oath answering questions from Republicans.
Does it surprise us that the entire thing was just a sham?
— Kim Ashley (@texaskat2003) June 7, 2019
The whole thing is beginning to look like one big sham.
Pulled on the American people.