Brit Hume seems as exasperated with Peter Strzok’s claim that his anti-Trump text messages weren’t biased as we are.
Not quite as much as Trey Gowdy (holy cow!) but close.
Just after noon, Peter Strzok actually denied that his text messages expressing disdain for Trump were “indicative of bias.” He actually said that.
— Brit Hume (@brithume) July 12, 2018
Yes. He actually said that.
And a bunch of other stupid stuff.
That’s because, Brit, you can have personal opinions and still do your job. I know that’s hard for you, but millions of us can do it!
— TheYachtClub (@TheYachtClub3) July 12, 2018
Ummm …
So why did Mueller remove him from the investigation?
— Brit Hume (@brithume) July 12, 2018
Ooh, ooh, we know!
He answered that question. Perception.
— Jena Axelrod (@JenaNotJameson) July 12, 2018
Perception.
Pfft.
Because it’s biased AF.
No, he said bias. Listen again. Well, first he said perception, then he said bias.
— Kelly (@sunnydays878) July 12, 2018
Just listening to Strzok you can tell he’s a biased, emotional, internally raging harpy pretending he’s not like the other members of the Resistance because of his job.
It’s pathetic.
He then said he thought Trump was bad b/c he insulted an immigrant soldiers family. Oh & ppl in northern VA smell!
— SeldenGADawgs (@SeldenGADawgs) July 12, 2018
We missed that?
Ha!
It’s unbelievable.
— Mrs. Mack (@BooBooNyc) July 12, 2018
Honestly, at this point, nothing shocks us anymore. It’s all sadly believable.
There's a difference between personal opinion and personal action. Bias is what happens in the action. By your measure, having an opinion at all is biased.
— Joe Hagan (@joehagansays) July 12, 2018
Ummm … again.
How in the world could a person….any person do their job on BOTH investigations With that kind of bias and not without Recusing themselves? How naive do you think we are? ????
— 4UDar (@DarleneIacoviel) July 12, 2018
Very, very, very naive apparently.
In no way do my text messages express what I texted. #ShortVersion pic.twitter.com/JxsMSILUTp
— MoronLessons™ ?? (@Lessons4Morons) July 12, 2018
Right?!
EL OH EL.
If this arrogant dishonest guy thinks he is helping himself or Dems w/ this performance he is sorely mistaken Says he didn’t recall the “We’ll stop him” text, then launched into full court press of righteous indignation that it was in response to Trumps comments about Khan Liar
— Kim Seefeld (@KAS_SB) July 12, 2018
We imagine even if he loses his job the Democrats will elect him OR MSNBC will hire him as a commentator.
he is an arrogant twerp. His smug smirk is indicative of not only his arrogance but also the sad fact that he KNOWS he will suffer no real consequences for his abuse of power. pic.twitter.com/MWyVAFYBnQ
— DPsportgirly (@dpkesq) July 12, 2018
Democrats.
Related:
HOLY SH*T! Trey Gowdy took Peter Strzok to the SHED in a HUGE way over his texts and DAAAMN
Join the conversation as a VIP Member