Sure, Kamala Harris was busy pushing legislation to make lynching illegal (because you know, it wasn’t illegal enough already), so she may have missed it but Trump has said his SCOTUS pick will likely be between TWO WOMEN.
Which makes this tweet from Kamala all the more laughable …
President Trump has already made this clear in the past on numerous occasions—he wants to nominate someone to the Supreme Court who will overturn Roe v. Wade & end a woman’s right to choose. This is about punishing women for wanting to control their lives. https://t.co/a4OwMw4lUy
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) July 2, 2018
Trump is going to appoint a woman to punish other women? Well, THAT oughta show em, right?! For being the so-called party of women the Left does a crappy job of truly championing them …
Isn’t it adorable how they pretend only evil, old, rich, white men are ultimately against abortion?
And by adorable we mean pathetic, sad, and super annoying.
Abortion isn't about a woman's rights.
— Voice of Privilege (@VoiceOfPrivileg) July 2, 2018
Women’s rights are the same as men’s rights.
Period the end.
You do not pass go, you do not collect $200.
Um no, it's about returning power to the States so they can decide whether a woman has the right to murder her own child.
— Emden Allen (@Emden_Allen) July 2, 2018
Funny how they get so freaked out when states can make their own decisions.
Awfully authoritarian of them doncha think?
Your stance is about punishing unborn babies for wanting to live
— Andy Ortiz (@Andy4Freedom) July 2, 2018
And enabling women (and men) to avoid responsibility for their actions. *shrug*
False statement in so many ways. It doesn’t change balance of court as you are replacing a Reagan appointee and Robert’s will not overturn Roe vs Wade. Secondly even if overturned it throws it back to states. Kamela is ok in Cal
— docgew (@michaelgewirtz) July 2, 2018
They really are ridiculous, aren’t they?