Earlier this week, lib author and all-around BS artist Patrick S. Tomlinson made a bizarre argument in his quest to prove life doesn’t begin at conception. If you read his ridiculous rantings you know he was trying desperately to get pro-life people to admit that a five-year-old’s life was more important than a bunch of frozen embryos.
Don’t look at us, we just work here.
Well, several people took Patrick to the shed about his argument (many got blocked in fact), but that didn’t stop him from trying again.
When we can grow embryos/fetuses to term in tanks without any involvement or risk to a human woman carrying them, then it will be time to discuss their value and rights independently, without any other considerations.
We aren't there yet.
— Patrick S. Tomlinson (@stealthygeek) October 19, 2017
Huh? So if an embryo doesn’t live inside of the womb they don’t have value or rights? How does existing in a tank make someone more alive?
Oh boy.
The value and rights of a life don't depend on any other consideration. @MattWalshBlog thoroughly debunked your thought experiment.
— Andy “no laws” Claus ?? (@R_ARich) October 19, 2017
Yes, Matt Walsh thoroughly and completely destroyed Patrick. As did Ben Shapiro, who he did ultimately block.
I know how desperate you are to believe that.
— Patrick S. Tomlinson (@stealthygeek) October 19, 2017
Check out the ego on this guy, EL OH EL.
I know how desperate you are to pretend he didn't.
— Andy “no laws” Claus ?? (@R_ARich) October 19, 2017
Ouch.
He didn't, in point of fact. He conceded the only point I was making in the first paragraph, then valiently defeated a series of strawmen.
— Patrick S. Tomlinson (@stealthygeek) October 19, 2017
Did Patrick just admit his entire argument was made out of strawmen?
Recommended
Gosh man, thanks for that.
Hey, two things we agree on; the pro-abortion arguments most often made are nothing more than straw men, and Matt exposed them as such.
— Andy “no laws” Claus ?? (@R_ARich) October 19, 2017
Maybe Patrick should just sit this one out.
We don't agree on that, because you are being dishonest and trying to play word games, just as Matt was.
That's really too bad.
— Patrick S. Tomlinson (@stealthygeek) October 19, 2017
K.
Oh, and then he explained why he blocks … everyone:
No, once you're an asshole I'll call you names and block you.
This is really hard for you guys to understand, huh?
— Patrick S. Tomlinson (@stealthygeek) October 19, 2017
So when does this winner block himself?
Editor’s note: Patrick does have the editor of this piece blocked because he doesn’t do so hot when debating pro-life WOMEN. He runs from them, tail tucked between his legs like a good male feminist.
Related:
DAFUQ?! Blue check civil rights she/her suggests 9 pm curfew for ALL MEN, hilarity ensues
Join the conversation as a VIP Member