So bad yet SO GOOD: This epic New York Times correction has people in stitches! [screenshot]

If anything was ever wince-worthy, this sure is!

https://twitter.com/AnnieLinskey/status/649668745200304129

Too good to check? Yes. Because it was making the rounds anyway this week on Twitter with sidesplitting results.

@AnnieLinskey I was thinking the same thing — yesterday! I see there is yet another correction today! Poor guy.

— Theresa Juva-Brown (@TJuva) October 1, 2015

That’s right. The correction lasted for MULTIPLE DAYS.

https://twitter.com/AnnieLinskey/status/649720084185919488

Stop it! Our aching sides can’t take much more.

@AnnieLinskey @lrozen Even the corrections bury the lead…Representative Rubio?

— Andy Wright (@AndyMcCanse) October 2, 2015

@AnnieLinskey Jesus. How does any NYT editor let "Congressman Rubio" get by 'em?

— These Robots Love Me (@EdwardEricsonJr) October 1, 2015

Well. Because, New York Times.

And back to the super embarrassing conversation with the editor:

https://twitter.com/AnnieLinskey/status/649670671446986752

Or:

@AnnieLinskey @willrahn could be just one drawn out sigh of profound disappointment

— Joe Gabriel Simonson (@SaysSimonson) October 1, 2015

Oh dear.

And in a sad nutshell:

@AnnieLinskey It would have been shorter to list what was actually correct in the original story.

— Andrew P. Scott (@apscott) October 1, 2015

Bless.