So, this Huffpo journo's giddy response to SCOTUS Obamacare ruling is beyond embarrassing

Journalism, schmournalism!

#Journalism https://t.co/xN32QhmoPg

— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) June 25, 2015

What sparked that? Well, take a gander at the giddy absurdity from HuffPo journo Jonathan Cohn when the Supreme Court ruled today 6-3 that Obamacare subsidies are legal:

6-3!!!!!!!!!!!!

— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015

YES!!!!!!!!!!!

— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015

A win for sanity — but, more important, for the millions of people who won't lose health insurance.

— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015

Roberts says "it is implausible" that Congress intended for law to function without subsidies — and cites Scalia dissent in NFIB. Zing.

— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015

Roberts: "The whole point of .. federal fallback" was to create functional exchange for states that don't. Exactly.

— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015

“The government couldn’t have won bigger." http://t.co/Iow0mUwotA

— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015

Good grief. His feed continued with more breathless giddiness that was beyond embarrassing and beyond parody. But here is some schooling for the Obama cheerleader:

@CitizenCohn And who still cant keep doc and who didnt save $2000/yr and have worse coverage and still waiting for worse stuff to hit.

— Chris Tsotsoros (@ctsotsoros) June 25, 2015

@CitizenCohn Oh yeah, they wouldn't lose their health insurance. Only the gov't subsidies paying for it. Meanwhile we did actually lose ours

— Ricky Clarke III (@RickyClarkeIII) June 25, 2015

And an excellent exit question for the lapdog:

@CitizenCohn Well I lost my plan that I liked. Why didn't you care when that happened?

— Ricky Clarke III (@RickyClarkeIII) June 25, 2015

We won’t hold our breath for an answer.

Related:

‘How ironic’: Search is on for Sally Kohn’s self-awareness after SCOTUS ruling on Obamacare