Oh, yes. It did.
Obama, Nobel Peace Prize winner, insists U.S. must strike Syria to deliver message – Washington Times: http://t.co/TvFHeNCsoF via @washtimes
— Kenneth Benway (@SandhillsKen) September 11, 2013
Did The Washington Times win with it deadpan “breaking news” headline after President Obama’s Syria speech Tuesday night? You decide!
The headline now omits the snarky Nobel Peace Prize winner part, but the slug remains the same. And here is a screenshot of the breaking news email:
Perfect.
Yes, the "man of contradictions." Wash Times headline: Obama, Nobel Peace Prize winner, insists U.S. must strike Syria to deliver message
— Merrill Matthews (@MerrillMatthews) September 11, 2013
That’s putting it mildly. Others have been calling out President Peace Prize, with smack-tastic results. We suspect it will continue!
Related:
‘This tweet wins!’ Give peace a chance or something: Obama’s speech in a nutshell
Game over! Actor Nick Searcy scores with photo-slam of ‘unbelievably small’ Obama
‘Brutal’: Fox News montage skewers Obama admin’s Syria contradictions, flip-flops and incompetence
‘Should have been cancelled’: Objective of president’s speech remains a mystery
Heh: Reporter asks Obama if Nobel Peace Prize presents a dilemma when preparing an attack
Smack-tastic! Dana Loesch, others slam President Nobel Peace Prize
Question of the day: Laura Ingraham expected a little more from a Nobel Peace Prize winner
Join the conversation as a VIP Member