slide 9 to 15 of 15

Glory Oys? Oops: NY Times correction of 'Bruce Springstein' sparks hilarity; Update: #BruceSpringsteinSongs

No, for real. The New York Times wrote an article in which they referred to singer Bruce Springsteen and “Bruce Springstein.”

Advertisement

Worse, they did it a number of times. A screenshot from the updated The New York Times article:

Perhaps the New York Times writer was just so horrified by Springsteen’s creepy ode to Obama that he invented a new singer?

Hilarity, of course, swiftly ensued.


https://twitter.com/HoagieHaus/status/266580240292270080

https://twitter.com/c_heller/status/266581585950814208


https://twitter.com/GenesisPOrridge/status/266582241696702464

Advertisement

Heh. More, please.

Update: And, the hilarity continues. Now with more hashtag. Enter: #BruceSpringsteinSongs

https://twitter.com/Heminator/status/266596573755092992

https://twitter.com/NathanWurtzel/status/266605085788876801

https://twitter.com/NathanWurtzel/status/266604318550011904

https://twitter.com/Heminator/status/266597441325903872

https://twitter.com/AdamWeinstein/status/266600632423690241

https://twitter.com/jaycaruso/status/266607273676263424

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos