Well, first of all there is this:
‚ÄĒ CC (@ChristiChat) October 19, 2016
‚ÄĒ Makada (@_Makada_) October 19, 2016
No surprise there, really.
@TheJuanWilliams how dare you defend what the Clinton campaign did to target our rights!!!!
‚ÄĒ The Morning Spew (@TheMorningSpew) October 19, 2016
Sigh. Another day, another display of willful ignorance by Juan Williams, who is trying to discredit Project Veritas and James O‚ÄôKeefe.
‚ÄĒ Fox News (@FoxNews) October 19, 2016
Really? James O‚ÄôKeefe responds.
‚ÄĒ James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) October 19, 2016
‚ÄĒ ‚ĒĆ–ü‚Ēź(‚ÄĘ_‚ÄĘ) (@exposeliberals) October 19, 2016
I agree. What okeefe exposed is nothing short of massive civil rights violations. https://t.co/GSOXpjqj7u
‚ÄĒ Rich Weinstein (@phillyrich1) October 19, 2016
Good little lapdog, indeed! Juan Williams also exposed himself as being ignorant of history. Take a look at this unbelievable revisionism:
Al Gore strongly challenged the election results in 2000. Democrats supported. Now they attack Trump for saying he MIGHT challenge. Crazy.
‚ÄĒ Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) October 20, 2016
Juan Williams holding his hankie to his chest over Trump. https://t.co/auSq60tSbI
‚ÄĒ tree hugging sister (@treehuggingsis) October 20, 2016
Huh. Forgot about this, Juan?
Nice revisionist history Juan Williams..it wasn't over till almost Xmas that's not going along w/ the results of the election. #debatenight
‚ÄĒ Red Pickle (@redsoutrage) October 20, 2016
Juan Williams. You lie when you said dems accepted Bush. They called him "selected" not "elected" for 8 yrs!!
‚ÄĒ ‚ôę Melody Stuart‚ôę (@MStuart1970) October 20, 2016
Mark Levin sums it up:
Juan Williams is embarrassing himself re whether Gore and Dems accepted 2000 election results. He's a hack.
‚ÄĒ Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) October 20, 2016
And some advice:
‚ÄĒ Chris (@Chris_1791) October 20, 2016
OUCH. That‚Äôs gotta smart. Beckel? Geez Louise!