https://twitter.com/TheRealPebo/status/436486305586094080
Snort.
What prompted that question from National Review’s Charles C.W. Cooke?
@charlescwcooke link?
— Greg Sargent (@ThePlumLineGS) February 20, 2014
@ThePlumLineGS Rob Portman said it on “Morning Joe.”
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) February 20, 2014
Just how “controversial” is it?
@ThePlumLineGS Right. I’m not sure how that’s a controversial statement. He didn’t even give a number, just a principle!
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) February 20, 2014
@charlescwcooke also, Portman's quote seems to fit comfortably with proposal to raise to 10.10 and then index to inflation
— Greg Sargent (@ThePlumLineGS) February 20, 2014
@ThePlumLineGS Indeed so. My position is “controversial”; his is pretty mainstream.
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) February 20, 2014
Cooke then offered up some pointed snark:
“Personally, I think it should be much too high, causing havoc and unemployment and making us all feel great. But that’s just me.”
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) February 20, 2014
Snickering madly.
Then he rightly gave the business to some spineless Republicans.
Republicans are such wimps with their “the minimum wage is about right” nonsense. Admit that you don’t believe in one; explain why.
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) February 20, 2014
Recommended
@charlescwcooke Politics: When you're explaining, you're losing. The left knows this is an easy, b.s. topic to swing ignorant people.
— Melissa Mackenzie (@MelissaTweets) February 20, 2014
Bingo.
What should the GOP do? Cooke has the answer.
“I came to bury the minimum wage, not to praise it.”
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) February 20, 2014
Bingo. RT @jonmunce: @charlescwcooke “It’s none of a politician’s business what two parties agree a fair wage is.”
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) February 20, 2014
Ding, ding, ding! Take note, GOP. There is your simple talking point. The science is, in fact, settled.
By the way, what happened to this?
https://twitter.com/ForbesOpinion/status/436494232552222720
Cooke brings it back home with this exit question:
Serious question for progressives: Is the case for the minimum wage different now than it was in 1987 when the NYT opposed it?
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) February 20, 2014
Related:
Six snarky reasons why someone mistook NRO’s Charles Cooke for a US Senator
‘A mindless automaton’: National Review’s Cooke blasts Left’s Koch fixation as only he can
Boom! National Review’s Cooke destroys mom-sneering ‘feminist’ with simple challenge
Tastes like chicken: Coward Piers Morgan still dodging gun debate with NRO’s Charles Cooke
CBO says minimum wage hike will cost 500K jobs; Dan Pfeiffer, WH run interference
‘Tell that to the Dems’: Stephen King hits GOP on minimum wage; Economics lesson ensues
Kirstie Alley not too worried about bypassing Congress on minimum wage
‘Obamacare math’: Nancy Pelosi claims $10.10 minimum wage would create 85,000 jobs; Citizens call BS
#IOwnMyLife: ‘Capitalist Pig’ Jonathan Hoenig proposes new minimum wage rule
‘Period!’ Dear GOP: Here is a simple talking point on Obamacare. Case closed
Join the conversation as a VIP Member