BOOM! RT @AceofSpadesHQ: [email protected]: On #Benghazi, Media acted as Obama's college buddies who tossed out his incriminating backpack
— KGB Agent Краска (@HouseCracka) May 6, 2013
Boom, indeed.
"The media is Obama's college pals who threw away his backpack." ~ @greggutfeld #TheFive
— Jack (@talkradio200) May 6, 2013
That was beautiful. But it didn’t end there. Who is up for an epic Ace of Spades media-blasting? We are!
As Twitchy reported yesterday, the fierce fighter for truth Sharyl Attkisson broke some news that destroyed Obama administration claims about Benghazi. Of course, the shameful attempted smearing of the whistleblowers began almost immediately.
Ms. Attkisson continues to do the job that few others in the media will do. Twitter users expressed their gratitude and offered support for the fabulous Ms. Attkisson.
Other journalists? Not so much. The lapdogs are far too busy, what with all that burying of Obama’s bones.
Take it away, Ace (and some fellow Twitter users)!
I can't help but to keep noticing that any story that hurts Obama (#gosnell, #benghazi, #OregonMedicaidStudy) doesn't draw media interest.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
Hmm. Curious!
Stories the media likes a whole heck of a lot: #GunControl, #GayStuff, #RapePreganancy, #JodiArias4Ever
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
@greg_from_108 don't be so paranoid, I'm sure there's some logical explanation
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
@NolteNC wait now @cnn has moved from #JodiArias4ever to a limo fire?
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
Oh and by the way Barack Obama had NOTHING to do with terrorist bomber Bill Ayers, according to the media. "Guy around the neighborhood."
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
You know, just a guy from the neighborhood whose apartment you launch your political career from. Just a guy.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
Whenever I launch a career I usually do it from the living rooms of persons whom I hardly know. I just show up with Schlitz.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
Has anyone in the media ever asked Obama or his team if his scripted How Dare You Line on #benghazi was scripted? http://t.co/L0qxaY4ljz
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
Yep. What about that?
There is no way to pretend the President did not promise the American people, in the most public way possible, that he and his administration would not play politics with Benghazi. If it turns out they have and that his own staff was part of it, he should be held responsible.
Well, the media will pretend. Pretend like the wind!
File that under "Questions the Media Doesn't Ask Because It Suspects the Answer Might Hurt the Team."
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
Is it not worth the question to confirm that an obviously-scripted response, with all sorts of rehearsed dramatic flourishes, was scripted?
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
Was this Spontaneous Obama or Obama Delivering a Practiced, Memorized Dramatic Monologue? http://t.co/0t8fJXjwHH Not worth the question?
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
@SissyWillis I assumed such. Apparently these sorts of obvious questions never occur to our Very Special Media.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
That is perfect. The Very Special Media, which is full of Special Snowflakes.
Hey I'm going to be calling them the VSM from now on– Very Special Media.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
"MSM" is a lie; they're not mainstream, they're left. They're niche and fringe, but they've taken over the media.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
But they are quite mediocre-minded (at best), but imagine themselves quite superior, so "Very Special Media" works.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
Yes, they totally believe they are Smarter Than You, bitterly clinging rubes.
And for god's sakes don't call them elite. They're not, and you flatter their delusions.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
@mooseandskwerl yup. Media-Government complex.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
Government-Entertainment complex.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 6, 2013
.@cNN's News priorities: Limo Fire, Jodi Arias, Amanda Knox http://t.co/0VFgnaXcVv
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
Remember when @CNN's brand identity was hard, smart news? Guess that's out the window.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
@AceofSpadesHQ @CNN That should get them through til Wednesday. Arias verdict will probably trump #Benghazi hearing.
— Jane (@OrthoA) May 7, 2013
@jamesrileyjr @CNN I meant their last deliberate branding effort was that. They keep pushing themselves that way. Like last year.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
@jamesrileyjr @CNN God knows they've never actually been that. But they've tried that branding.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
.@cnn = @piersmorgan News Network. Same sensibility. Tabloid, trashy, shabby. News for lefty yobbos.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
Bingo.
He continued his epic drubbing of the media today.
.@TheAnchoress let me offer a hypothesis: the press is so determined to be skeptical and not taken in by the right…
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
.@TheAnchoress …that they permit themselves to be guileless and willing to believe anything whatsoever from Obama and the left.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
Let me propose that being a Credulous Idiot for one side is not the way to show one's empiricism and skeptical nature @TheAnchoress
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
The benghazi crap never made sense but the press sure did behave as if asking questions was itself a sort of Birtherism @TheAnchoress
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
The press's main argument on #Benghazi was: "But the people directly involved SAID they did nothing wrong!!!11eleventy!!"
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
Also, racist!
Oh… the people suspected of malfeasance have said they did nothing wrong? Well why didn't you say so right away. Case Closed, old man.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
@GlomarResponder That's Gold Standard, man.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
MSM obviously believes that the right is TOO suspicious of Obama. But the antidote to that should not be for the press to have NO suspicion.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) May 7, 2013
Lapdogs need their kibble, dude.
This Twitter user responds to Ace and puts it in a nutshell.
@AceofSpadesHQ MSM is customer service for Team Obama. They sold him to us, now they protect their brand name by claiming user ignorance
— KBDaBear (@kbdabear) May 7, 2013
The Fourth Estate is dead. But, hey, maybe they’ll get some more glazed donuts out of the deal.
Related:
‘Bomber in the Rye’: Ace of Spades shreds sickening NYT story likening Tsarnaev to Holden Caulfield
Ace of Spades: hey media, how’s that George Zimmerman coverage going?
Shaming the shameless: Ace of Spades destroys media over union violence, Crowder attack embargo
Giggle-snort of the day: Ace of Spades asks Elizabeth Warren questions the lapdog media won’t
Lapdogs: Not Obama’s fault! Problem with debate was not enough media control; Ace of Spades destroys
Ace of Spades shreds media for perpetuating Newtown heckling hoax
Ace of Spades shatters the media and the babbling ‘Zen of Chuck Hagel’
Shaming the shameless redux: Ace of Spades blasts BuzzFeed’s bias
‘The Guild protects its own’: Ace slams media coverage of CNN’s ‘ethnic purge’ of Soledad O’Brien
Bam! Ace hammers MSM for smearing the Right while hiding lefty criminals’ politics
Soledad O’Brien claims she’s so special that she’s above bias; mocking, debunking ensues
Ace of Spades, NRO destroy ‘real journalists’ covering for Obama at Romney foreign policy presser
