Don Lemon to Gavin Newsom: America Shoots Protesters Just Like Iran – No...
'People Are Starting to Notice': Viral Close-Up of Karoline Leavitt Triggers Outrage Cycle...
Internal Polling Come Out? Senate Dems Are Lying Even Harder About Blame for...
Defiant Statement from Invisible Iranian Supreme Leader: Media Fails to Mention He Hasn't...
Ilhan Omar’s Nepo-Baby Princess Pilgrimages to Cuba to Cosplay as a Revolutionary...
They’re Not Even Hiding It Anymore: Pritzker Lays Out Dems Plan to Weaponize...
Japan's PM Checked Out the White House's Presidential Walk of Fame and Then...
Oh, HONEY, Stop ... Who Wants to Tell Her? MN Dem OBGYN Rep's...
JB Pritzker Reveals Plan to Arrest Trump Officials: 'Project 2029'
Shipwreckedcrew BUSTS VA Dem Attorney Running for Fake District Telling HUGE Lie About...
Bill Melugin Has a Thread of the Craziest TSA Schumer Lines at US...
Racial Reckoning? WAT? WaPo Out-Stupids Themselves Using Statue to Paint America's Birthda...
Nancy Pelosi Explains Why Dems Need to Take Back the House (ZERO Pushback...
Chuck Norris Walks Through The Valley of The Shadow of Death, Is Not...
The Role of Prayer in American Wars From the Revolution to Today

The Supreme Court strikes down Montana's limits on campaign finance, reaffirms Citizens United ruling

The Supreme Court ruled on American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock today. This case involved campaign finance laws and is sometimes nicknamed “Citizens United 2” by politicos and SCOTUS-watchers. The United States Supreme Court reversed the Montana Supreme Court’s decision.

Advertisement

The key part of the one page opinion (Justice Breyer wrote a dissent and was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan):

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, this
Court struck down a similar federal law, holding that
“political speech does not lose First Amendment protection
simply because its source is a corporation.” 558 U. S. ___,
___ (2010) (slip op., at 26) (internal quotation marks omitted). The question presented in this case is whether the
holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state
law. There can be no serious doubt that it does. See U. S.
Const., Art. VI, cl. 2. Montana’s arguments in support of
the judgment below either were already rejected in Citizens United, or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case.
The petition for certiorari is granted. The judgment of
the Supreme Court of Montana is reversed.
It is so ordered.

As Twitchy reported earlier, the Supreme Court also issued a decision on Arizona’s immigration law this morning, which kind of stole the thunder from this also important case.

This is a hugely important First Amendment ruling and it was met with great approval by those who value, you know, The Constitution and freedom of speech.

Advertisement

Fail,  Montana.

Senator McConnell (R-Ky.) also lauded the decision.

Who did not applaud the decision? The Left, of course. They don’t care for free speech and seek to quash it whenever they can. If you can’t beat them, silence them! That’s their motto.

Advertisement

And, zing!

https://twitter.com/jstrevino/status/217276554634465280

Truth. Of course, the Left tries to paint conservatives as hypocrites. Because, populist? Or anti-Wall Street? Or something. We aren’t quite sure; our cuckoo pants to sane decoder ring is in the shop. Twitter users give them a little taste of “truth to power” in response.

https://twitter.com/LachlanMarkay/status/217259004152393728

https://twitter.com/rorycooper/status/217259197748871168

https://twitter.com/LachlanMarkay/status/217258192684580864

Indeed. Kudos, Supreme Court!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos