Escape Podcast: Ratings-Challenged CNN Appears to Have Ended Jake Tapper’s Office-Based Sh...
Freedom of the Prez: Democrat Activist ‘Journo’ Don Lemon Isn’t Ruling Out a...
Fang Pangs: Dem Eric Swalwell Decries His Transparency Standards Being Applied to Own...
BBC Asks if the UK Is Becoming Too Dog-Friendly
The Hill: GOP Calls to Get 'Undocumented Children' Out of Public Schools Grow
Newsweek: Trump Says Birthright Citizenship Wasn’t Meant for Rich People From China
Bill Melugin's 'Inflammatory Framing' of Michigan Synagogue Attack Causes Butthurt
Daily Beast: New Investigation Corroborates Claims of Woman Who Says Trump Sexually Abused...
Vox Asks If It’s Wrong to Send Your Child to a Private School
When 'Equity' Meets Reality: Trans Woman Rages as Biological Woman Cuts the Queue...
WaPo's Breaking News Indicates Eric Swalwell's Attorneys Do NOT Want Kash Patel to...
Did 'Coach' Walz Write It? X ROASTS Dems Over New 'Playbook For Winning...
‘Not Possible’ to Tell Which Twin Is the Father — Because the Mother...
Councilwoman Tells Public to Strip Off Their Clothes Made From the Cotton Picked...
Mayor Smiley: Mural for Slain Ukrainian Refugee Iryna Zarutska Must Go — It's...

'Rational' leftists attacking strawmen with 'religious' fervor

Boycotting a store at which you don’t shop makes about as much sense as complaining about a SCOTUS ruling that exists only in your imagination. Clearly, getting a verified Twitter account is way easier than getting a clue.

Advertisement

Backbench celebrities and pundits are crawling out of the woodwork to make what they must believe are very wise and witty statements about the Hobby Lobby ruling.

A lot of circumstances “shape” medical decisions, but the only coercion here was a government coercing Hobby Lobby. Nobody is coerced to work for them or for any other “closely held” company, and nobody has been forbidden from—heaven forbid—using their own money to pay for options not covered by their insurance.

Why is it “reasonable” to assume that employers are morally obligated to shop for personal services for their employees? “Reasonable” would be paying people for their work with money and letting them make their own decisions on how to spend it.

https://twitter.com/kumailn/status/483715866001829888

Derp. Maybe you didn’t notice but the case was about the government butting into religion, not the other way around.

Advertisement

Anyone know if Elayne is a drinker? Seriously.

Some people aren’t even pretending to understand what the case was about. 

Person miseducated about the Hobby Lobby case condemns miseducation about birth control.

Name one religious precept imposed by Hobby Lobby. You can’t, Chucky.

Sorry, Cenk. You didn’t build that. People don’t lose their religious liberty just because they hire someone for a job.

Advertisement

Employer provided insurance is nothing but an unintended consequence of past progressive assclownery like wage and price controls. Remaining hidebound to it to the degree you start trampling religious freedom is not rational in the least. Rational insurance practice is the insurance customer finding their own insurance provider–as happens when someone insures their home, their car, their business, etc.

Deliver us from what liberals deem “rational.”

***

Related

Planned Parenthood’s Cecile Richards fights Hobby Lobby decision with safe, legal stupidity

Lena Dunham weighs in on SCOTUS’ Hobby Lobby ruling

‘Clueless or lying’: Sandra Fluke ‘purposefully ignoring’ fact in Hobby Lobby decision

Fu*k you:’ Left-wingers want to ‘burn down’ Hobby Lobby after SCOTUS win

 

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement