Former green jobs czar Van Jones thought that tweet accusing the NRA of “treason” was so clever, he tweeted it a second time and tacked on an extra question mark.
Does #NRA think US Const protects "right" 2 shoot USA cops & soldiers? Keep saying folks need big guns 2 fight our govt. Um… #Treason??
— Van Jones (@VanJones68) January 17, 2013
Hey, Truther Jones isn’t saying NRA members are traitors and wants to “shoot USA cops & soldiers”; He’s just asking questions. Or not. His later tweets drop the question marks after the #Treason hashtag.
Those saying 2A needed to give citizens ability to fight USA's soldiers: why stop with guns? U need tanks, drones, jets. Right? #Treason
— Van Jones (@VanJones68) January 18, 2013
Tanks? Evidently Van is a Musket Morgan fan.
.@BrandonXDixon But if fighting US soldiers is rationale for 2A, why limit it? Assert right to ALL weapons. Liberty is at stake! #Treason
— Van Jones (@VanJones68) January 18, 2013
.@BrandonXDixon / Tell that to a drone. Or a tank. Or nuke. Why not call for ALL weapons to kill USA soldiers. What's stopping u? #Treason
— Van Jones (@VanJones68) January 18, 2013
So, that’s what? Five #Treason hashtags from the Mumia-supporting Marxist Truther? Is this how that “national conversation” on gun violence is going to go?
https://twitter.com/GoldenGalt/status/292109945862750208
https://twitter.com/vadum/status/291795035035430912
https://twitter.com/Norsu2/status/291941411270578176
Hey, Van, any last thoughts before you scurry off to figure out why the treason argument didn’t go over so well?
@GoldenGalt @ursadailynews Gotta run!
— Van Jones (@VanJones68) January 18, 2013
Yeah, we thought so.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member