QUIET Piggy! Jessica Tarlov Posts Dumbest Take YET In Paranoid Rant About Nick...
Tim Walz's Horrible, Terrible, No GOOD, Week Gets Worse When DAMNING 2018 Somali-Fraud...
More Minnesota Malfeasance: Amy Klobuchar Faces Federal Lawsuit Over 'Smurfing' Campaign F...
YouTuber's CREEPY Post About Filming 'Conservative Daycare Centers' to Dunk on Nick Shirle...
Scott Jennings: Americans Need to See Someone in Power Imprisoned for Massive Blue...
Fraud Flashback: Tim Walz Said Refugees Were the Economic and Cultural Future of...
LA Mayor Karen Bass Says She’s ‘Sad’ Hispanic American Border Patrol Agents Are...
Five Years Later, Pelosi Says Speech Rip Was Impulse – Sure, Jan... Er,...
WaPo Gives Sob Story of Boy Who Won the Girls’ 400 Meter Twice
'Somali-Americans Are Human' Reminder Backfires Big Time As X Points Out Nazis and...
Covenant School Shooter's Mom Says She Bought Guns With Her Federal Student Aid...
Minnesota Announces 'Quality Learing Center' Featured in Video Has Been Closed Down
Boo-Hoo at CBS: Journos Throw Tantrum Over Editor Actually Editing: Demand 'Independence'...
Scott Jennings Points to the Latest Proof Trump's REALLY Failing at Living Up...
Minnesota Star Tribune Claims It Has Covered State's Fraud Crisis for More Than...

@NewsBusters: 'We've Recorded Over 8,000 Cases of Online Censorship'

AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

NewsBusters of the Media Research Center tweets that it has recorded over 8,000 cases of online censorship.

Advertisement

It is a blessing to live in a nation where the freedom of speech exists.

Online censorship is a double-sided coin. On the one hand, online media platforms are private companies and, as such, hold rights to make business decisions. On the other hand, companies that purport themselves to be marketplaces of online communication and information dissemination should allow communication and information dissemination.

Widely used media platforms bear a particular responsibility to maintain credibility on this issue. Though they are their own companies and conduct their own business, part of that business is properly stewarding the power and influence they hold. Perhaps they are "too big" to censor. If a major media platform selectively censors certain content, that selective censorship has a disproportional impact on other media and communication in general. When content that should not be censored is censored, there is an uneven disruption in the flow of communication.

A debate can be had about how, in practice, needed censorship and free speech should be balanced.

Advertisement

Some censorship is needed. If any platform, large or small, operates under the guideline of not allowing certain vulgar or otherwise distasteful content, that can, within reason, be a basis for censorship enforcement. A problem arises when an objective censorship guideline is stretched to include content that is disliked by the company or censors that be. A political candidate or officeholder posting content as such is newsworthy and should not be censored. There are other exceptions, as well.

The target should be as much freedom as possible, an appropriate rule of thumb for regulation in general. Censor as little as possible rather than pull down an inordinate amount of speech on flimsy grounds.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement