Here's an Election Night Flashback (and More) Featuring Canned 60 Minutes Journo Libs...
Obama-Nominated U.S. Attorney Says E. Jean Carroll IS Above the Law
Clay Travis Has a Status Update on the Dem Party's Average Male Voter...
Just WOW: Yet ANOTHER 'Assassination Attempt' Made on a Sitting Trump-Appointed SCOTUS Jus...
E. Jean Carroll's BIZARRE Interview About How She TRICKED the Jury Every Day...
CBS Reporter Just Proved Some Journos Are STILL Part of the 'Conspiracy of...
James Talarico Claims His Many MAGA Supporters Have to Whisper Their Support for...
DERANGED Tucker Carlson Goes FULL Woke Right Claiming Holocaust Museums Must Include THIS...
Jimmy Failla Flashes Back to What Jill Biden Was Chanting Just After Supposedly...
WHOA: Here's What the Case Against E. Jean Carroll Is REALLY About –...
Miranda Devine Calls BS on Jill Biden's Way Too Obvious Attempt to Rewrite...
CNN's Abby Phillip SHREDS Jill Biden for Saying She Thought Joe Stroked Out...
Taste for Turkey: High-Testosterone LGBBQ+ Actor to Star in Proposed Pro-Meat James Talari...
Bracing for Beto 2.0: MAGA Prepares for Legacy Media Fawning Over Boring Beta...
Woman at Illinois State Capitol Says in Prayer That Islam Is Woven Into...

@NewsBusters: 'We've Recorded Over 8,000 Cases of Online Censorship'

AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

NewsBusters of the Media Research Center tweets that it has recorded over 8,000 cases of online censorship.

Advertisement

It is a blessing to live in a nation where the freedom of speech exists.

Online censorship is a double-sided coin. On the one hand, online media platforms are private companies and, as such, hold rights to make business decisions. On the other hand, companies that purport themselves to be marketplaces of online communication and information dissemination should allow communication and information dissemination.

Widely used media platforms bear a particular responsibility to maintain credibility on this issue. Though they are their own companies and conduct their own business, part of that business is properly stewarding the power and influence they hold. Perhaps they are "too big" to censor. If a major media platform selectively censors certain content, that selective censorship has a disproportional impact on other media and communication in general. When content that should not be censored is censored, there is an uneven disruption in the flow of communication.

A debate can be had about how, in practice, needed censorship and free speech should be balanced.

Advertisement

Some censorship is needed. If any platform, large or small, operates under the guideline of not allowing certain vulgar or otherwise distasteful content, that can, within reason, be a basis for censorship enforcement. A problem arises when an objective censorship guideline is stretched to include content that is disliked by the company or censors that be. A political candidate or officeholder posting content as such is newsworthy and should not be censored. There are other exceptions, as well.

The target should be as much freedom as possible, an appropriate rule of thumb for regulation in general. Censor as little as possible rather than pull down an inordinate amount of speech on flimsy grounds.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement