Escape Podcast: Ratings-Challenged CNN Appears to Have Ended Jake Tapper’s Office-Based Sh...
Freedom of the Prez: Democrat Activist ‘Journo’ Don Lemon Isn’t Ruling Out a...
Fang Pangs: Dem Eric Swalwell Decries His Transparency Standards Being Applied to Own...
BBC Asks if the UK Is Becoming Too Dog-Friendly
The Hill: GOP Calls to Get 'Undocumented Children' Out of Public Schools Grow
Newsweek: Trump Says Birthright Citizenship Wasn’t Meant for Rich People From China
Bill Melugin's 'Inflammatory Framing' of Michigan Synagogue Attack Causes Butthurt
Daily Beast: New Investigation Corroborates Claims of Woman Who Says Trump Sexually Abused...
Vox Asks If It’s Wrong to Send Your Child to a Private School
When 'Equity' Meets Reality: Trans Woman Rages as Biological Woman Cuts the Queue...
WaPo's Breaking News Indicates Eric Swalwell's Attorneys Do NOT Want Kash Patel to...
Did 'Coach' Walz Write It? X ROASTS Dems Over New 'Playbook For Winning...
‘Not Possible’ to Tell Which Twin Is the Father — Because the Mother...
Councilwoman Tells Public to Strip Off Their Clothes Made From the Cotton Picked...
Mayor Smiley: Mural for Slain Ukrainian Refugee Iryna Zarutska Must Go — It's...

@NewsBusters: 'We've Recorded Over 8,000 Cases of Online Censorship'

AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

NewsBusters of the Media Research Center tweets that it has recorded over 8,000 cases of online censorship.

Advertisement

It is a blessing to live in a nation where the freedom of speech exists.

Online censorship is a double-sided coin. On the one hand, online media platforms are private companies and, as such, hold rights to make business decisions. On the other hand, companies that purport themselves to be marketplaces of online communication and information dissemination should allow communication and information dissemination.

Widely used media platforms bear a particular responsibility to maintain credibility on this issue. Though they are their own companies and conduct their own business, part of that business is properly stewarding the power and influence they hold. Perhaps they are "too big" to censor. If a major media platform selectively censors certain content, that selective censorship has a disproportional impact on other media and communication in general. When content that should not be censored is censored, there is an uneven disruption in the flow of communication.

A debate can be had about how, in practice, needed censorship and free speech should be balanced.

Advertisement

Some censorship is needed. If any platform, large or small, operates under the guideline of not allowing certain vulgar or otherwise distasteful content, that can, within reason, be a basis for censorship enforcement. A problem arises when an objective censorship guideline is stretched to include content that is disliked by the company or censors that be. A political candidate or officeholder posting content as such is newsworthy and should not be censored. There are other exceptions, as well.

The target should be as much freedom as possible, an appropriate rule of thumb for regulation in general. Censor as little as possible rather than pull down an inordinate amount of speech on flimsy grounds.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement