Dearborn Mayor Proclaims His Name Is 'As American As Any Other' (Spoiler Alert:...
Polling Group Caught Intentionally Spreading Fake Polling Data in 'Social Experiment'
No WORDS: Sounds INSANE but It's True — Abdul El-Sayed MUST Answer for...
Democrats Looking Worse and WORSE for the Midterms (and It's All Their Own...
OOF: James Talarico's LATEST Stunt Says SO MUCH About How He's Doing With...
How DESPERATE Is Ro Khanna's Race-Baiting Talking Points? ONE Repugnant Post Says It...
Just WOW: Lefty Coffee Shop Owner Boots Young Pro-Lifers After Comparing Them to...
Pros. Descano Helped Illegal Islamic Extremist Murderer Get Passport — Yeah, It Gets...
WOW: The Way Jon Ossoff Is Trying to SPIN His Sleazy Natalie Harp...
Adam Carolla Blasts Chris Cuomo After Ex-CNN Host Tells Him to Stop Sharing...
Black Socialist Elijah Manley Seeks Primary Win Over Debbie Wasserman Schultz Because She’...
DNC Passes Resolution to Abolish ICE, Ensuring Dem Presidential Candidate Will Be Pro-Ille...
Pope Leo XIV Urgently Calls for the International Community to Advance the Two-State...
Messages Scrawled on Aircraft Flap by Service Members Show No Morale, Says Iranian...
Man Stumped That MAGA Supported Kyle Rittenhouse but Condemned Alex Pretti

@NewsBusters: 'We've Recorded Over 8,000 Cases of Online Censorship'

AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

NewsBusters of the Media Research Center tweets that it has recorded over 8,000 cases of online censorship.

Advertisement

It is a blessing to live in a nation where the freedom of speech exists.

Online censorship is a double-sided coin. On the one hand, online media platforms are private companies and, as such, hold rights to make business decisions. On the other hand, companies that purport themselves to be marketplaces of online communication and information dissemination should allow communication and information dissemination.

Widely used media platforms bear a particular responsibility to maintain credibility on this issue. Though they are their own companies and conduct their own business, part of that business is properly stewarding the power and influence they hold. Perhaps they are "too big" to censor. If a major media platform selectively censors certain content, that selective censorship has a disproportional impact on other media and communication in general. When content that should not be censored is censored, there is an uneven disruption in the flow of communication.

A debate can be had about how, in practice, needed censorship and free speech should be balanced.

Advertisement

Some censorship is needed. If any platform, large or small, operates under the guideline of not allowing certain vulgar or otherwise distasteful content, that can, within reason, be a basis for censorship enforcement. A problem arises when an objective censorship guideline is stretched to include content that is disliked by the company or censors that be. A political candidate or officeholder posting content as such is newsworthy and should not be censored. There are other exceptions, as well.

The target should be as much freedom as possible, an appropriate rule of thumb for regulation in general. Censor as little as possible rather than pull down an inordinate amount of speech on flimsy grounds.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement