Dems Won't Extend BBB's 'No Tax on Tips' to State Taxes ('Champions for...
Quibbles and Brits: Jimmy Kimmel Tells UK Viewers That America’s a Hotbed of...
Terror Plot Exposed: Somali-Backed Jihadist Planned to Crash Plane into Atlanta High-Rise
Ghost Daycares, No Kids, Millions Vanished: Nick Shirley's Bombshell Probe into Minnesota'...
From Grinch to Hero: Jets Reverse Course, Let Fan Kick for $100K After...
Tragic 'Nickelodeon Effect': Tylor Chase in Sad State – Viral Videos and Jackets...
Exposed: Rep. Ilhan Omar's Dad – Siad Barre Colonel Linked to Isaaq Genocide,...
Bidens Celebrate 'Hope' with New Great-Grandson, Continue Shunning Hunter's Child Navy
Debbie Wasserman Schultz Tries Out New Dem Attack Line on Deportations: 'We Can't...
Obama Presidential Center Explains What the Mocked Building Design Is Supposed to Represen...
Jimmy Kimmel's Humiliating Christmas Tantrum Gets Dwarfed by Trump
Harry Sisson Proudly Shows the World How Broken He Is With His TDS...
'What a Monster'! NY Times Shredded Again for Spin on What Trump's Christmas...
ANOTHER Rhode Island Dem Tried Playing the 'Do You Know Who I Am'...
WOW: Minnesota Lt Governor Peggy Flanagan Takes Somali-PANDERING to a Whole New Level...

@NewsBusters: 'We've Recorded Over 8,000 Cases of Online Censorship'

AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

NewsBusters of the Media Research Center tweets that it has recorded over 8,000 cases of online censorship.

Advertisement

It is a blessing to live in a nation where the freedom of speech exists.

Online censorship is a double-sided coin. On the one hand, online media platforms are private companies and, as such, hold rights to make business decisions. On the other hand, companies that purport themselves to be marketplaces of online communication and information dissemination should allow communication and information dissemination.

Widely used media platforms bear a particular responsibility to maintain credibility on this issue. Though they are their own companies and conduct their own business, part of that business is properly stewarding the power and influence they hold. Perhaps they are "too big" to censor. If a major media platform selectively censors certain content, that selective censorship has a disproportional impact on other media and communication in general. When content that should not be censored is censored, there is an uneven disruption in the flow of communication.

A debate can be had about how, in practice, needed censorship and free speech should be balanced.

Advertisement

Some censorship is needed. If any platform, large or small, operates under the guideline of not allowing certain vulgar or otherwise distasteful content, that can, within reason, be a basis for censorship enforcement. A problem arises when an objective censorship guideline is stretched to include content that is disliked by the company or censors that be. A political candidate or officeholder posting content as such is newsworthy and should not be censored. There are other exceptions, as well.

The target should be as much freedom as possible, an appropriate rule of thumb for regulation in general. Censor as little as possible rather than pull down an inordinate amount of speech on flimsy grounds.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos