Vince Vaughn Laments 'Agenda-Driven' Late Night Shows
Double Visions: Republican John Curtis Paired With Policy Twin Adam Schiff - Floats...
Loyola School Paper Sorry for Calling Illegal Alien Accused of Murdering Student an...
UK Rag Says That Comedy Legend John Cleese Is Ruining His Legacy
Lord of the Rings Trilogy Has Many Elements That Are Difficult to Watch...
Venezuelan Deported to CECOT Last Year Suing the Trump Administration for $1.3 Million
WIN: Second Federal Appeals Court Rules ICE Is Required to Detain Most Deportees
AV Club Ruins Harry Potter Excitement by Whining About Rowling Funding 'Transphobic Causes...
'Pasty, White, Wannabe Cowboy' Markwayne Mullin Says He’s a Cherokee Like Elizabeth Warren
Bringing Death and Disease: Rep. Mary Miller Highlights Illegals with AIDS and TB...
Good: TSA Tipped Off ICE to Woman at Airport With Deportation Order
Dem Rep. Jason Crow Spills REAL Reason Schumer's Shutdown Continues (THIS Is Why...
Church of England Enthrones First Female Archbishop: Years of Tradition Overturned
Cringe: Governor Newsom Press Office Introduces the 'TrumpBot 3000'
Here's Springsteen Promoting US Tour Fighting Authoritarian Admin (While Trump Does NOTHIN...

Cato Institute Warns: 'Tariffs Could Hike Food Prices and Cut Variety'

AP Photo/Paul Sancya

"Imported produce isn't just nice—it's essential," reads a tweet published by the Cato Institute. "Yet tariffs could hike food prices and cut variety, leaving Americans to foot the bill."

Advertisement

Tariffs on imported goods could cause some goods to be more expensively available in the United States than otherwise. Thus, it is logical that the tariffed goods could cause an increase in the price of such goods and could eliminate a lot of variety. Without tariffs, the imported goods supplement, without the taxation at importation, what is produced in the U.S. Thus, it is logical that non-tariffed imported goods could help keep prices from rising higher than otherwise they might and add to the available variety of goods.

The idea of tariffs is sometimes used politically in relation to protecting U.S.-based producers, and thereby protecting U.S. jobs. Perhaps there is a correlation, but tariffs need to be considered carefully before being employed as a means of protection. Abundance may be a healthier means of providing for the economy as a whole and could also benefit more Americans. Some people may not want to use foreign-made products or eat foreign-produced food. That is why there are options available and price levels to accompany them.

Advertisement

We are in a period of high inflation, so it stands to reason that most anything that benefits the consumer is the policy way to go. Perhaps imports should not be considered, automatically at least, as poison for U.S. producers and businesses. The opportunity to compete is available at all times, and it is also possible that the items imported, particularly raw materials, could aid in production, both as a function of production and the cost thereof, as well as consumption. The notion that U.S. businesses cannot succeed without the government stepping in and slapping tariffs on imported goods is a tough one. On the other hand, such tariffs could very well leave consumers, as the Cato Institute tweets, "To foot the bill."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement