Vanity Fair: New Doc Says Elon Musk Had ‘A Degree of Certainty’ About...
Fetterman Crosses the Aisle: Democratic Senator Praises Trump at RNC, Infuriates His Own...
Gubernatorial Candidate Says Her Pronouns Are Mom, Texan, and Soon-To-Be Governor
Pray the Grounded Girls Get Chosen Before the Bitter Ones Hoard the Good...
'I'm Saving Your Number': CBS' Gayle King Fangirls Over Lindsay Clancy's Attorney
Hunter Biden Launches $LAPTOP Memecoin, Which Crashes 99 Percent Two Hours After Launch
Brian Stelter Has a Pic From the Packed House at Oliver Darcy's 'Information...
Mehdi Hasan Wants Apologies From Those Who Insisted War Would Stop If Hamas...
FAIL: James Talarico Tries to Convince a Reporter He No Longer Believes All...
Joe Scarborough: White House Will Hate the Success of Tennis Star From S**thole...
Those CREEPY HANDS! Gavin Newsom Scolds JD Vance While Bragging About Healthcare for...
‘Let’s Roll’: Flight 93 Hero Todd Beamer’s Father Endorses Mike Rogers — ‘Vote...
Ted Cruz Cites CNN's Reporting on James Talarico (Kaitlan Collins Runs Cover for...
American Heroes of 9/11: Officer John W. Perry
The Party of Empathy Wishes JK Rowling Had Been Offed by Her Ex-Husband

Sen. Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci 'Must Answer for His Involvement Leading Up to COVID-19'

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

"He must answer for his involvement leading up to Covid-19 and the subsequent cover-up," tweets Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas). "Dr. Fauci has lied to the American people, manipulated scientific definitions, presented weak theories, & funded deadly gain-of-function research."

Advertisement

Absorb the seriousness of the charges leveled in the preceding tweet by Sen. Marshall.

This is an indictment of corruption, not science. This is an example of failed leadership.

One definition of science is "a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study" (Merriam-Webster, Eleventh Edition). Presumably, institutions of scientific research, be they government-based or in the private sector, exist to seek scientific truth and knowledge that can be applied to practical living. Such a mission requires objectivity and the ability to allow desirous outcomes to be subservient to the scientific information acquired. To manipulate something is to change what it is. To attempt to manipulate scientific research is to change it from an objective scientific study to a subjective unscientific construct.

Perhaps some agency-based scientific institutions feel pressure to produce certain outcomes in order to obtain funding or be considered essential. Perhaps some of these agencies of scientific research predetermine outcomes to be reached based on ideology and philosophy. There is no excuse for hack science that could endanger lives.

Advertisement

One piece of scientific information acquired by an agency, while it alone may not prove an ideological case or sway the outcome of an election, could end up being useful far beyond the current moment and issues of the day. Within the framework of basic morality and constitutional freedom, expert researchers in various fields should be free from biases. They should be allowed to seek and find true scientific solutions. There is no need for the American people to be lied to. There is no need for scientific definitions to be manipulated. There is no need for weak theories to be presented.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement