Reid Hoffman's Terrible, Horrible, No-Good, VERY BAD Epstein's Files Release Just Keeps Ge...
Jamie Raskin Starts Panicking During Hysterical SAVE Act Meltdown
'Very Revealing'! One Short Word in AOC's WaPo Layoffs Take Gives Away How...
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Showed Her TRUE Colors at The Grammys
GRRL, No! LOL! Kamala Harris Tries to QUIETLY Make BIG Change to Her...
Here's Brian Stelter on WaPo's Woes vs. X's Potential Demise (One of These...
So It BEGINS! Ilhan Omar Will Absolutely FLIP OUT When She Sees What...
Hey Look, the Democrats Finally Support a Photo ID Requirement
All the BOOM: Sen. Eric Schmitt TORCHES Soros-Funded, Racist-Happy NGO in RUTHLESS, Receip...
Transportation Secretary Duffy (With a James Woods Assist) ROASTS Gavin Newsom's Bullet Tr...
BEEP BEEP! Louise Lucas' Grandkid's Desperate 'Granny Is a Boss' Glow-Up Attempt HILARIOUS...
More Democrat Inspired Terrorism: Details Emerge of Maryland Man's Attempt to Murder Russ...
Battle of the Bulge: Olympic Ski Jumpers Allegedly Injecting Themselves 'Down There' for...
Another Crazed Nurse Posts Anti-ICE Video, Appears to Be Armed With Saline Spray
Scott Jennings Comes Up Empty in Attempt to Teach Econ 101 to CNN...

Sen. Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci 'Must Answer for His Involvement Leading Up to COVID-19'

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

"He must answer for his involvement leading up to Covid-19 and the subsequent cover-up," tweets Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas). "Dr. Fauci has lied to the American people, manipulated scientific definitions, presented weak theories, & funded deadly gain-of-function research."

Advertisement

Absorb the seriousness of the charges leveled in the preceding tweet by Sen. Marshall.

This is an indictment of corruption, not science. This is an example of failed leadership.

One definition of science is "a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study" (Merriam-Webster, Eleventh Edition). Presumably, institutions of scientific research, be they government-based or in the private sector, exist to seek scientific truth and knowledge that can be applied to practical living. Such a mission requires objectivity and the ability to allow desirous outcomes to be subservient to the scientific information acquired. To manipulate something is to change what it is. To attempt to manipulate scientific research is to change it from an objective scientific study to a subjective unscientific construct.

Perhaps some agency-based scientific institutions feel pressure to produce certain outcomes in order to obtain funding or be considered essential. Perhaps some of these agencies of scientific research predetermine outcomes to be reached based on ideology and philosophy. There is no excuse for hack science that could endanger lives.

Advertisement

One piece of scientific information acquired by an agency, while it alone may not prove an ideological case or sway the outcome of an election, could end up being useful far beyond the current moment and issues of the day. Within the framework of basic morality and constitutional freedom, expert researchers in various fields should be free from biases. They should be allowed to seek and find true scientific solutions. There is no need for the American people to be lied to. There is no need for scientific definitions to be manipulated. There is no need for weak theories to be presented.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement