WHCA President Who Was Sitting Next to Trump Puts Down ANOTHER Conspiracy Theory...
Trump Obliterates Norah O’Donnell: 'You’re Disgraceful' After She Tries Smearing Him With...
Obama Plays Dumb on Trump Assassination Attempt: 'Unknown Motive' Despite Shooter’s Anti-T...
Disposable Lives: The Media’s Selective Outrage Over Assassination Attempts on Trump
Truth Hurts, Malcolm: Democrats Slam Fetterman for Basic Common Sense on White House...
Princeton Prof Kevin Kruse & Popehat: Trump’s Being a Big Baby About All...
Some On The Left Are Already Trying to Luigi Mangione the Trump Assassin...
Sen. Rand Paul Gives an Encouraging Prognosis on the Debt
Jonathan Turley Shares the Truth: The Left Called It a False Flag —...
AOC: 'No Place for Political Violence' — After Calling Trump Hitler And Palling...
Apology Lasted Hours: Jvnior Promises to Stop Lying, Immediately Posts Bogus IDF Shirt...
Sean Davis Spots a Difference Between Football Games and a Hotel
Bill Kristol Is Concerned About How It Could Be Used
PBS WH Correspondent (Acosta's GF!) BODIED for Whining That Hegseth Wouldn't Answer Questi...
Bless Their HEARTS! Brian Stelter and Other Media Already Making Assassination Attempt Abo...

Sen. Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci 'Must Answer for His Involvement Leading Up to COVID-19'

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

"He must answer for his involvement leading up to Covid-19 and the subsequent cover-up," tweets Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas). "Dr. Fauci has lied to the American people, manipulated scientific definitions, presented weak theories, & funded deadly gain-of-function research."

Advertisement

Absorb the seriousness of the charges leveled in the preceding tweet by Sen. Marshall.

This is an indictment of corruption, not science. This is an example of failed leadership.

One definition of science is "a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study" (Merriam-Webster, Eleventh Edition). Presumably, institutions of scientific research, be they government-based or in the private sector, exist to seek scientific truth and knowledge that can be applied to practical living. Such a mission requires objectivity and the ability to allow desirous outcomes to be subservient to the scientific information acquired. To manipulate something is to change what it is. To attempt to manipulate scientific research is to change it from an objective scientific study to a subjective unscientific construct.

Perhaps some agency-based scientific institutions feel pressure to produce certain outcomes in order to obtain funding or be considered essential. Perhaps some of these agencies of scientific research predetermine outcomes to be reached based on ideology and philosophy. There is no excuse for hack science that could endanger lives.

Advertisement

One piece of scientific information acquired by an agency, while it alone may not prove an ideological case or sway the outcome of an election, could end up being useful far beyond the current moment and issues of the day. Within the framework of basic morality and constitutional freedom, expert researchers in various fields should be free from biases. They should be allowed to seek and find true scientific solutions. There is no need for the American people to be lied to. There is no need for scientific definitions to be manipulated. There is no need for weak theories to be presented.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement