Chuck Schumer's Attempt to Mock Trump's Authenticity Gets Roasted Into a Fully Cooked...
Journo Who Admits Burying Swalwell Info Now Blames Fox for Not Covering It—Even...
Spineless in New York: Rep. Lawler Sides With 'The Squad' to Protect Haitian...
Want to Know How Gavin Newsom Sold So Many Books? (Hint: It Wasn't...
Dem Rep. Rosa DeLauro Took Out Her Raw Milk Rage on RFK Jr....
Katie Pavlich Drops BOMBSHELL on Mamdani: Your Family’s Massive Uganda Estate Should Be...
What Changed? Old Obama Clip Championed a Nation’s Right to Defend Itself ......
NYC Mayor Mamdani's Office Thrilled This Is Their Most Viewed Video (So Are...
Maine Dem Senate Hopeful Platner Apologizes ... Again — At This Point, His...
NBC News: 'Queer the Ballet' Is Trying to Fix National Crisis of Scarcity...
Reid Wiseman Moved to Tears at Sight of the Cross
Newsweek: Student Self-Deports After Enduring ‘Inhumane’ ICE Conditions
Mayor Brandon Johnson Talks Reparations, Says Restaurant Industry Has Vestiges in Slavery
The Other Shoe Drops: Anna Paulina Luna Reports Sexual Misconduct Allegations Against Rube...
Once Fine Blokes, Now Just Broke: UK Would Be the Poorest State in...

Sen. Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci 'Must Answer for His Involvement Leading Up to COVID-19'

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

"He must answer for his involvement leading up to Covid-19 and the subsequent cover-up," tweets Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas). "Dr. Fauci has lied to the American people, manipulated scientific definitions, presented weak theories, & funded deadly gain-of-function research."

Advertisement

Absorb the seriousness of the charges leveled in the preceding tweet by Sen. Marshall.

This is an indictment of corruption, not science. This is an example of failed leadership.

One definition of science is "a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study" (Merriam-Webster, Eleventh Edition). Presumably, institutions of scientific research, be they government-based or in the private sector, exist to seek scientific truth and knowledge that can be applied to practical living. Such a mission requires objectivity and the ability to allow desirous outcomes to be subservient to the scientific information acquired. To manipulate something is to change what it is. To attempt to manipulate scientific research is to change it from an objective scientific study to a subjective unscientific construct.

Perhaps some agency-based scientific institutions feel pressure to produce certain outcomes in order to obtain funding or be considered essential. Perhaps some of these agencies of scientific research predetermine outcomes to be reached based on ideology and philosophy. There is no excuse for hack science that could endanger lives.

Advertisement

One piece of scientific information acquired by an agency, while it alone may not prove an ideological case or sway the outcome of an election, could end up being useful far beyond the current moment and issues of the day. Within the framework of basic morality and constitutional freedom, expert researchers in various fields should be free from biases. They should be allowed to seek and find true scientific solutions. There is no need for the American people to be lied to. There is no need for scientific definitions to be manipulated. There is no need for weak theories to be presented.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos