DNC Suing to Compel the Trump Administration to Say If It's Planning to...
MD's Eye-Opening Thread: Be Cordial, But Hover Like a Hawk – Hospital Horror...
Here We GO! Georgia US House 14 Special Election General Results LIVE With...
‘Media Personality’ Notes Pete Hegseth Doesn’t Salute Black Service Member
Weird Lefty Wonders Why Kai Trump Could 'Irreversibly Transition' Her Teeth as a...
Bill Maher Tells Podcaster His Position Feels Like 'Someone Who Just Wants to...
DHS Says News Report of US Citizen Being Detained for Two Days is...
Shots Fired at US Consulate in Toronto, RCMP Confirms It's a National Security...
This Hero Wears Blue: Viral Image of NYPD Chief Inspires Hope Among New...
Latest Poll Shows American Democrats Are the Most Ungrateful, Miserable SOBs on the...
FACT-Filled Thread Takes NYT APART for Sharing Fake Pic of Crowd Cheering New...
Capitol Police Officer Honored on Fancy New J6 Plaque Reminds Us AGAIN Democrats...
Another L For the North: Canadian Journo Tries to Prove You Can't Make...
BURN! US Oil & Gas Association BODIES Newsom Press Office 'Pajama Boy' in...
CNN Forced to Delete Viral Fake Report As Trump Stuns Hosts Live

Sen. Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci 'Must Answer for His Involvement Leading Up to COVID-19'

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

"He must answer for his involvement leading up to Covid-19 and the subsequent cover-up," tweets Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas). "Dr. Fauci has lied to the American people, manipulated scientific definitions, presented weak theories, & funded deadly gain-of-function research."

Advertisement

Absorb the seriousness of the charges leveled in the preceding tweet by Sen. Marshall.

This is an indictment of corruption, not science. This is an example of failed leadership.

One definition of science is "a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study" (Merriam-Webster, Eleventh Edition). Presumably, institutions of scientific research, be they government-based or in the private sector, exist to seek scientific truth and knowledge that can be applied to practical living. Such a mission requires objectivity and the ability to allow desirous outcomes to be subservient to the scientific information acquired. To manipulate something is to change what it is. To attempt to manipulate scientific research is to change it from an objective scientific study to a subjective unscientific construct.

Perhaps some agency-based scientific institutions feel pressure to produce certain outcomes in order to obtain funding or be considered essential. Perhaps some of these agencies of scientific research predetermine outcomes to be reached based on ideology and philosophy. There is no excuse for hack science that could endanger lives.

Advertisement

One piece of scientific information acquired by an agency, while it alone may not prove an ideological case or sway the outcome of an election, could end up being useful far beyond the current moment and issues of the day. Within the framework of basic morality and constitutional freedom, expert researchers in various fields should be free from biases. They should be allowed to seek and find true scientific solutions. There is no need for the American people to be lied to. There is no need for scientific definitions to be manipulated. There is no need for weak theories to be presented.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement