Twilight Zone Politics: Carville Backs Parkland Activist David Hogg to Lead ‘Dysfunctional...
Scott Jennings Warns of Dem Outrage After Sharing ‘Racist’ Cross on Sen. Graham’s...
Senator John Fetterman to Democrats: 'If You Don’t Want Me, Just Say So'
Brit Hume Counts the Ways Things Could Get VERY Awkward for Fauci at...
Rahm Emanuel, the Last Sane Dem, Tells Party: Stop Chasing Abolition Fantasies and...
MI Senate Candidate (D-Commie) El-Sayed’s Financials Drop: Rules for Thee, Overseas Rental...
Catherine Herridge Adds Disturbing Context to Tapes of Biden Sharing Classified Info With...
Patricia Heaton Drops Epic Banger: Watch for Jake Tapper’s New Book, 'How Fauci...
They're SO Guilty: Entire CNN Panel EXPLODES on Lydia Moynihan for Daring to...
My Dinner With Anthony: CNN’s Jake Tapper Was Sharing Meals in His Home...
CNN’s ‘Media Analyst’ Brian Stelter Opts to Ignore Fauci Diary Scandal Involving Tapper...
Minneapolis Restaurant Taking a 'Break' After Taking Prices Off the Menu in Name...
Black Lives Matter Mob in Madison Blocks Entrance to 'Racist Bar'
Jonathan Chait Argues That Abolishing the Senate May Be the DSA’s Best Idea
Lawyer Says Elderly and Disabled Will Suffer as 350,000 Haitians Lose Temporary Protected...

Sen. Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci 'Must Answer for His Involvement Leading Up to COVID-19'

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

"He must answer for his involvement leading up to Covid-19 and the subsequent cover-up," tweets Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas). "Dr. Fauci has lied to the American people, manipulated scientific definitions, presented weak theories, & funded deadly gain-of-function research."

Advertisement

Absorb the seriousness of the charges leveled in the preceding tweet by Sen. Marshall.

This is an indictment of corruption, not science. This is an example of failed leadership.

One definition of science is "a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study" (Merriam-Webster, Eleventh Edition). Presumably, institutions of scientific research, be they government-based or in the private sector, exist to seek scientific truth and knowledge that can be applied to practical living. Such a mission requires objectivity and the ability to allow desirous outcomes to be subservient to the scientific information acquired. To manipulate something is to change what it is. To attempt to manipulate scientific research is to change it from an objective scientific study to a subjective unscientific construct.

Perhaps some agency-based scientific institutions feel pressure to produce certain outcomes in order to obtain funding or be considered essential. Perhaps some of these agencies of scientific research predetermine outcomes to be reached based on ideology and philosophy. There is no excuse for hack science that could endanger lives.

Advertisement

One piece of scientific information acquired by an agency, while it alone may not prove an ideological case or sway the outcome of an election, could end up being useful far beyond the current moment and issues of the day. Within the framework of basic morality and constitutional freedom, expert researchers in various fields should be free from biases. They should be allowed to seek and find true scientific solutions. There is no need for the American people to be lied to. There is no need for scientific definitions to be manipulated. There is no need for weak theories to be presented.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement