Two Ambassadors Tell Jim Acosta Trump Admin Reminds Them of Germany in the...
Here's the Group Backing That USPS Whistleblower Calling Out Trump's 'Chaotic' Mail-In Bal...
'Rev.' Talarico’s Federal Abortion Corps: Critics Call Out Fanatic After Post-Dobbs Letter...
Chuck Todd Thinks Susan Collins Sharing Factual Info About Her Dem Opponent Shows...
Woman Wants Us to Imagine the ‘Psychological Whiplash’ Tyler Robinson Must Be Going...
BRUTAL! Susan Collins Vowed Not to Mention Something About Troy Jackson (Guess What...
Try Not to Get Whiplash From MS NOW's Chris Hayes' Pivot on Musk...
American Heroes of 9/11: The Boatlift
Mamdani’s Signal Army: Influencers Get Daily Talking Points — Some Get $5K–$20K in...
James Talarico's Quest to Prove His Real Texan Cred Led Him to Cracker...
Netflix Earns Eye Rolls After Previewing Doc About Journos' Harrowing Ride on 'The...
Biden-Appointed Lesbian Judge Writes Opinion: No First Amendment Right to Pride Flags in...
This Is NOT the Person CNN Anchors Needed Rushing to Their 'Journalism' Defense
Spencer Pratt Trolled ‘Filthy Commie’ Hasan Piker and the Ownage Has Been Spectacular
New Mom Stabbed to Death Walking Home to Her Baby. Free Palestine Activists:...

Sen. Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci 'Must Answer for His Involvement Leading Up to COVID-19'

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

"He must answer for his involvement leading up to Covid-19 and the subsequent cover-up," tweets Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas). "Dr. Fauci has lied to the American people, manipulated scientific definitions, presented weak theories, & funded deadly gain-of-function research."

Advertisement

Absorb the seriousness of the charges leveled in the preceding tweet by Sen. Marshall.

This is an indictment of corruption, not science. This is an example of failed leadership.

One definition of science is "a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study" (Merriam-Webster, Eleventh Edition). Presumably, institutions of scientific research, be they government-based or in the private sector, exist to seek scientific truth and knowledge that can be applied to practical living. Such a mission requires objectivity and the ability to allow desirous outcomes to be subservient to the scientific information acquired. To manipulate something is to change what it is. To attempt to manipulate scientific research is to change it from an objective scientific study to a subjective unscientific construct.

Perhaps some agency-based scientific institutions feel pressure to produce certain outcomes in order to obtain funding or be considered essential. Perhaps some of these agencies of scientific research predetermine outcomes to be reached based on ideology and philosophy. There is no excuse for hack science that could endanger lives.

Advertisement

One piece of scientific information acquired by an agency, while it alone may not prove an ideological case or sway the outcome of an election, could end up being useful far beyond the current moment and issues of the day. Within the framework of basic morality and constitutional freedom, expert researchers in various fields should be free from biases. They should be allowed to seek and find true scientific solutions. There is no need for the American people to be lied to. There is no need for scientific definitions to be manipulated. There is no need for weak theories to be presented.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement