Stubborn As a Hogg: Ex-DNC Vice Chair Says Graham Platner Should Go Away...
MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Misses ‘Excellent Journalism’ From Her Tenure As Biden’s Press...
Retired Border Patrol Commander-At-Large Greg Bovino: 'Notice the Entitlement'
'I Have Somewhere to Be, Man': Enjoy This Video of an Ultra-Karen Getting...
NYT's Nicholas 'Dog-Rape' Kristof Doesn't Take Anything at Face Value
Abortion Doctor Admits Elective Late-Term Abortions Happen 'All the Time'
CNN’s Erin Burnett Looks Into 'Multiple' Sailors Trying to Go Overboard on the...
Alyssa Farah Griffin Wants Campus Protests for Afghan Girls but Skips It on...
Arrested SPLC Official Says White Supremacy Is One of the Worst Things Created...
Atlantic Contributor Suggests the Republican Equivalent of Woke 1.0
Trump Weighing Kari Lake, Scott Jennings, and Spencer Pratt As Possible Replacements for...
Adam Kinzinger Says ICE Using Non-Lethal Shock Gloves Feels a Bit Communist
Electrifying News! DHS Plans to Equip ICE Agents With Non-Lethal Shock Gloves
Transphobic ‘Comedian’ Tells NBA Stars to Chemically Transition or STFU
Scott Jennings Hilariously DROPS Abdul El-Sayed and His 'Football Challenge' With a Single...

Sen. Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci 'Must Answer for His Involvement Leading Up to COVID-19'

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

"He must answer for his involvement leading up to Covid-19 and the subsequent cover-up," tweets Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas). "Dr. Fauci has lied to the American people, manipulated scientific definitions, presented weak theories, & funded deadly gain-of-function research."

Advertisement

Absorb the seriousness of the charges leveled in the preceding tweet by Sen. Marshall.

This is an indictment of corruption, not science. This is an example of failed leadership.

One definition of science is "a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study" (Merriam-Webster, Eleventh Edition). Presumably, institutions of scientific research, be they government-based or in the private sector, exist to seek scientific truth and knowledge that can be applied to practical living. Such a mission requires objectivity and the ability to allow desirous outcomes to be subservient to the scientific information acquired. To manipulate something is to change what it is. To attempt to manipulate scientific research is to change it from an objective scientific study to a subjective unscientific construct.

Perhaps some agency-based scientific institutions feel pressure to produce certain outcomes in order to obtain funding or be considered essential. Perhaps some of these agencies of scientific research predetermine outcomes to be reached based on ideology and philosophy. There is no excuse for hack science that could endanger lives.

Advertisement

One piece of scientific information acquired by an agency, while it alone may not prove an ideological case or sway the outcome of an election, could end up being useful far beyond the current moment and issues of the day. Within the framework of basic morality and constitutional freedom, expert researchers in various fields should be free from biases. They should be allowed to seek and find true scientific solutions. There is no need for the American people to be lied to. There is no need for scientific definitions to be manipulated. There is no need for weak theories to be presented.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement