That’s Eracism!: Stanford University Gets Caught AI-Altering Ad Photo to Make Students Mor...
The Banish Acquisition: Insiders Say Mood at CNN Is Like a Funeral After...
El-Sayed and El-Salad: Dem Enlists Kamala Harris to Win Over ‘Black Birthing People’...
Minister From James Talarico’s Church Admits They’re Not a Belief-Based Church
Since 1986, Geraldo Rivera Has Never Met a Rake He Couldn't Step On
CNN's Brian Stelter Says There Will Almost Certainly Be Layoffs After Paramount Merger
Boston Globe: Queer Community Splintered Over Lesbian Bar That Dropped Strict Mask Mandate
CBS News: Critics Say Converse 'Lynching' Ad May Have Been Intentionally Crafted to...
Vandals Spray-Paint ‘Kill Donald Trump’ and ‘Talarico — Love Wins’ at Site of...
Grand Jury Finds Zero Evidence of Foul Play in Death of Black Teen;...
Chris Christie Is Thinking About 2028, and X Has Thoughts
The Snark Is Strong With This One: JD Vance Echoes His Boss With...
What Alaska’s 50+ Voters Are Saying About the Senate Race
Choice of Color: Podcaster Joy Reid Sides With Clancy Trial Holdout Juror for...
Trump Made His First Remarks Without the TV Pool and Reviews Are Enthusiastic

Sen. Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci 'Must Answer for His Involvement Leading Up to COVID-19'

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

"He must answer for his involvement leading up to Covid-19 and the subsequent cover-up," tweets Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas). "Dr. Fauci has lied to the American people, manipulated scientific definitions, presented weak theories, & funded deadly gain-of-function research."

Advertisement

Absorb the seriousness of the charges leveled in the preceding tweet by Sen. Marshall.

This is an indictment of corruption, not science. This is an example of failed leadership.

One definition of science is "a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study" (Merriam-Webster, Eleventh Edition). Presumably, institutions of scientific research, be they government-based or in the private sector, exist to seek scientific truth and knowledge that can be applied to practical living. Such a mission requires objectivity and the ability to allow desirous outcomes to be subservient to the scientific information acquired. To manipulate something is to change what it is. To attempt to manipulate scientific research is to change it from an objective scientific study to a subjective unscientific construct.

Perhaps some agency-based scientific institutions feel pressure to produce certain outcomes in order to obtain funding or be considered essential. Perhaps some of these agencies of scientific research predetermine outcomes to be reached based on ideology and philosophy. There is no excuse for hack science that could endanger lives.

Advertisement

One piece of scientific information acquired by an agency, while it alone may not prove an ideological case or sway the outcome of an election, could end up being useful far beyond the current moment and issues of the day. Within the framework of basic morality and constitutional freedom, expert researchers in various fields should be free from biases. They should be allowed to seek and find true scientific solutions. There is no need for the American people to be lied to. There is no need for scientific definitions to be manipulated. There is no need for weak theories to be presented.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement