WORST AG on the Planet Claims He's Safeguarding Rights and WHOA NELLIE That's...
Here's an Election Night Flashback (and More) Featuring Canned 60 Minutes Journo Libs...
Obama-Nominated U.S. Attorney Says E. Jean Carroll IS Above the Law
Clay Travis Has a Status Update on the Dem Party's Average Male Voter...
Just WOW: Yet ANOTHER 'Assassination Attempt' Made on a Sitting Trump-Appointed SCOTUS Jus...
E. Jean Carroll's BIZARRE Interview About How She TRICKED the Jury Every Day...
CBS Reporter Just Proved Some Journos Are STILL Part of the 'Conspiracy of...
James Talarico Claims His Many MAGA Supporters Have to Whisper Their Support for...
DERANGED Tucker Carlson Goes FULL Woke Right Claiming Holocaust Museums Must Include THIS...
Jimmy Failla Flashes Back to What Jill Biden Was Chanting Just After Supposedly...
WHOA: Here's What the Case Against E. Jean Carroll Is REALLY About –...
Miranda Devine Calls BS on Jill Biden's Way Too Obvious Attempt to Rewrite...
CNN's Abby Phillip SHREDS Jill Biden for Saying She Thought Joe Stroked Out...
Taste for Turkey: High-Testosterone LGBBQ+ Actor to Star in Proposed Pro-Meat James Talari...
Bracing for Beto 2.0: MAGA Prepares for Legacy Media Fawning Over Boring Beta...

Sen. Roger Marshall: Dr. Fauci 'Must Answer for His Involvement Leading Up to COVID-19'

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

"He must answer for his involvement leading up to Covid-19 and the subsequent cover-up," tweets Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas). "Dr. Fauci has lied to the American people, manipulated scientific definitions, presented weak theories, & funded deadly gain-of-function research."

Advertisement

Absorb the seriousness of the charges leveled in the preceding tweet by Sen. Marshall.

This is an indictment of corruption, not science. This is an example of failed leadership.

One definition of science is "a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study" (Merriam-Webster, Eleventh Edition). Presumably, institutions of scientific research, be they government-based or in the private sector, exist to seek scientific truth and knowledge that can be applied to practical living. Such a mission requires objectivity and the ability to allow desirous outcomes to be subservient to the scientific information acquired. To manipulate something is to change what it is. To attempt to manipulate scientific research is to change it from an objective scientific study to a subjective unscientific construct.

Perhaps some agency-based scientific institutions feel pressure to produce certain outcomes in order to obtain funding or be considered essential. Perhaps some of these agencies of scientific research predetermine outcomes to be reached based on ideology and philosophy. There is no excuse for hack science that could endanger lives.

Advertisement

One piece of scientific information acquired by an agency, while it alone may not prove an ideological case or sway the outcome of an election, could end up being useful far beyond the current moment and issues of the day. Within the framework of basic morality and constitutional freedom, expert researchers in various fields should be free from biases. They should be allowed to seek and find true scientific solutions. There is no need for the American people to be lied to. There is no need for scientific definitions to be manipulated. There is no need for weak theories to be presented.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement