'Desperate COW DOOKEY!' Crazy-Eyed Dem’s Claims About Voter ID in Pennsylvania Set off...
Tom Homan Gives a STUNNING Update on What ICE Located in Minnesota (Over...
BRUTAL Open Letter to Hakeem Jeffries About His Epstein Connections and More a...
Never Trump Toad Tries RUNNING (Locks Down) After Nasty Post About John Ekdahl's...
Take a Bow! Percentage of Americans Who Have Trust in Media Nears the...
AYFKM?! ABC News' Headline About Canadian Trans Shooter SO UNBELIEVABLY BAD They Lock...
Chris Murphy's Posts Are ALWAYS Dumb, but THIS Trump Post Proves He WANTS...
Captain Kirk Just Set Phasers to Vaporize
Slate: Conservatives Are Terrified That Urban Progressive Lesbians Are Buying Guns
ICE Is Citing SUBURBAN MOMS Who 'Protest and Document' ICE Activity
'I Love It When The Felon Is More Honest About Reality Than The...
Lawsuit: Children and US Citizens Detained for Four Hours Without Food During ICE...
CBS News: Irish Illegal Says He Fears for His Life in Modern-Day ICE...
Outrage in FL: Miss North Florida Dethroned for Rejecting Miss America’s Trans-Inclusive C...
Report: CNN Has Lost Nearly Two-Thirds of Its Viewership Since 2016

Regarding 'Trump Verdict and Polls,' Byron York Counsels: 'Wait Two or Three Weeks'

AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson

"I think it would be a good idea to wait two or three weeks and then start looking at the Biden-Trump if-the-election-were-today question that has been asked all along," tweets Byron York.

Advertisement

Polls are funny. Sometimes they reflect a change in public sentiment after something happens, and sometimes they reflect no change.

"If the election were today, who would you vote for?" is a question that implies the possibility that a respondent may vote for a different person than his or her survey answer if the election is next week, next month, or half a year down the calendar. Large poll movements during an election cycle indicate that there are those who change their plan for voting based on events, such as a convention speech or a debate. Whether there is a large contingent of mind-changers among voters or whether that is merely signaled in polling data is not entirely discernable.

Take an "October surprise," an attention-getting story about a candidate that falls out of the closet in the weeks preceding an election. And then the polls react to it. Are there, in reality, millions of Americans who switch their votes from one candidate to another based on headlines that appear in the final stretch of a campaign?

Polls cannot be exclusively relied upon as political barometers. They are only snapshots of public sentiment. They survey a portion or sample size of a larger group. Poll results are subject to error, something that is self-evidenced by the fact that polls disclose a "margin-of-error" in their results. Polls are, at some level, subjective. The variables that go into a poll's composition require some degree of subjectivity, variables such as who is polled, how many are polled, and what questions are asked. Historic inaccuracy is another reason polls should be digested with a healthy degree of skepticism.

Advertisement

Polls may be accurate, which is one reason they cannot be completely ignored. Some polls garner headlines and move the political needle merely due to the name of the firm conducting the poll. Polls are useful for political discussion and argumentation. They can be used by various campaigns to bolster their own messaging or in an attempt to politically damage opposition.

It is June. Election Day is in November. It is worth wondering how many actual voters have yet to decide how they are going to vote.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement