Rashida Tlaib Pushing to Enforce a SCOTUS Code of Ethics BITES Her on...
BRING IT, Commie: Jessica Tarlov THREATENS GOP That if They Don't Stop Fighting...
Stand Back, He's GONNA BLOW! Marc Elias Continues Multi-Day CRASH OUT Over SCOTUS...
Dem Rep. Jamie Raskin Claimed SCOTUS Is Gerrymandered and MS NOW Was Totally...
DAMN! Scott Jennings UNLOADS on MeidasTouch Gnat for Wagging His Finger in His...
LA Mayor Karen Bass' 'Showing Up for the City Every Day' Reelection Pitch...
Obama Bro Jon Favreau Learns the HARD WAY That There's a Tweet for...
Maine Candidate Matt Dunlap Shows That It's Not Just Nazis Who Democrats Love,...
Someone Call 911! Oh, Wait -- You Can't Do That in Gavin Newsom's...
New Era? MeidasTouch's Adam Mockler Says Nazi-Tattooed Dem Graham Platner Has Forward-Look...
Sunny Hostin Says Her Kids Have Fewer Civil Rights Since SCOTUS Ended Race-Based...
Maine Kampf: Bernie Sanders Gives Dem Senate Hopeful Graham Platner His Socialist Seal...
JK Rowling Reacts to Two Jews Wounded in London Stabbing Attack by Somali-Born...
Judge Halves Rapist’s Sentence Noting He’s an African American Male Who’s ‘Experienced Thi...
Texas Judge Clears Way for Work to Resume on Muslim-Centric EPIC City

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos