Trans Child Sex Offender Who Exposed Himself in Women's Locker Room Gets BIG...
Acres and Fakers: ‘No Kings’ Speaker Says Land Must Be Given to Indigenous...
Uncrowning Achievement: GOP Account Launches Successful Anti-Tiara Attack on Tim Walz for...
UN Resolution Declares the Transatlantic Slave Trade 'The Gravest Crime Against Humanity'
'Scripted, Paid, Organized and Fake': Robert De Niro's 'No Kings' Rant Didn't Seem...
Daughter of Somali War Criminal Turned Millionaire Rep. Ilhan Omar Slams America as...
Is This Real? Liberals Deploying the 'Heavies' for Saturday's No Kings Protests
WaPo: Experts Say Iran Images 'Appear to Show' Landmines Scattered by US Forces
Divorced, Miserable, and Vile: Jennifer Welch's Jealous Assault on Younger, Accomplished E...
Training Video Coaches Doctors to Ask Which Body Parts Couples Use in their...
Say It Ain't Snow: Commie Mayor's Snow Shovelers Still Waiting for Their 'Fair...
Walz: Somalis' Great-Grandchildren Will Be Here When That Orange Clown Is in the...
We Stopped Celebrating Men Like Tim Tebow — And Society Is Poorer For...
And? Sheridan Gorman’s Killer Is Developmentally Impaired and Can’t Read or Write
Former 'Conservatives' With Trump Derangement Syndrome Are Paying for Nationwide 'No Kings...

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement