NBC News: 18-Year-Old US Citizen Dies of Cancer With His Parents by His...
Piers Morgan Zings the Diversity of the Late-Night Boys' Club
WaPo: Most Trump Deportees Are Men, Leaving Women to Raise Families Alone
Champagne Commies Courtside: Hypocrites Drop Thousands on Lakers Seats While Preaching Aga...
John Fetterman Urges People to Get Over Their TDS Over the Reflecting Pool...
Democrats' Mask Off: Marc Elias Pushes to Abolish Virginia Gov't Altogether Because Dems...
Was Nicholas Kristof's Dog-Rape Opinion Piece Meant to Head Off This Brutal New...
Kristof Screws the Pooch: Supposed Medical Journals Backfire Spectacularly
Ro Khanna: SC, Where First Shot of Civil War Was Fired, Denies Blacks...
Someone Call a Priest Because Kash Patel Just BURIED Chris Van Hollen Over...
Pro-Hamas Marchers Wave Hezbollah Flag Outside Brooklyn Synagogue; Harmeet Dhillion Is on...
‘Be Nice to Me’: Dem CA Gov Hopeful Becerra Begs Reporter for Friendly...
Kevin Hart's Roast Proves Once and for ALL that Woke Is DEAD (and...
NYT Denies Rumor It’s Considering Retracting Nicholas Kristof’s Israeli Dog-Rape Piece
The New Midterm Outlook Has Hakeem Jeffries Sweating

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement