Giffords Org Endorsing Dog-Killing Gun Grabber Abdul El-Sayed BACKFIRES (Pun Intended) SPE...
He MAD. SO Mad. ROFL! --> Eugene Vindman FLIPS OUT on Trans Constituents,...
Hung Cao DESTROYS Media Attempts to Gin Up a Fake Scandal on the...
Cenk Uygur Has Zero Self-Awareness: Calls the Biblical Covenant a 'Psychopath’s Whisper'
Poor Stacey Abrams: Trapped Under 'Authoritarian Rule' … yet She Still Wanted to...
'No Greater Insult': Trump Condemns Vandalism of WWII Memorial As Lunatic Lady Faces...
Fever Pitch: Some Are Pointing to WNBA’s Sophie Cunningham As Trump’s New WH...
Suddenly Hormones Matter: 'Comedian' Walter Masterson’s WNBA Rule Exposes His Own Hypocris...
Michigan Voters Aren’t Buying Stepstool Abdul — CNN Can’t Figure Out Why
'An Animal Slaughterhouse': New Allegations About Abdul El-Sayed's History Are Horrifying
Jim Acosta Is Mad Trump’s Name Going Back Up on Kennedy Center, Wants...
They Would Know: Nick Freitas and Spencer Pratt Tell Us EXACTLY What Happened...
‘Hurt People Hurt People’? Cool Story, Bro: MI Jews Build a Coalition to...
Dad, It's Just ISIS: SNL Got It Right Spoofing White College Age Leftist...
'No One Should Be Jailed for Stealing Toothpaste' — Peak Progressive Brainrot From...

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement