Ted Cruz Needed 2 Words to Finish Off a Months-Long Feud With Beleaguered...
Literally Testified for the Blind Sheikh — Now Leading Race for US Congress...
Hantavirus Cruise Ship Americans Get One-Way Ticket to Nebraska Isolation
Matt (Matty)Yglesias Throws Tantrum Over Judges Who Won't Let Virginia Dems Ignore the...
'F***!' Anonymous House Dems Spill to Axios How Disastrous the SCOVA Ruling Is...
Babylon Bee Has the PERFECT Final Scene for Mark Hamill's Despicable Tale of...
Stick a Fork In Him: Wes Moore Tanks His 2028 Aspirations With BIZARRE...
Stacey Abrams Takes Time Out of Her Busy Schedule Being President
Megyn Kelly's Producer Goes Full TINFOIL Blaming Algorithm (Mark Levin?!) for Abrupt Click...
Acosta Sounds the Democracy Alarm ... Right After Virginia Supreme Court Dares to...
Angry Staffer Gets a Heapin' Helpin' of GOV 101 After Claiming VA Decision...
Cuck Chair Karma: Louise Lucas Taunts Backfire as VA Supreme Court Strikes Down...
Louise Lucas' Customized Va. License Plate Aged Poorly (Your 'Maybe She Can Make...
Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Illegal Map & Spells Doom for Broke Democrats
She MAD! Unhinged Leftist Woman Screeching Outside the VA Supreme Court Building Is...

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement