$11 Million Somali Medicare Fraudster Given Probation in Plea Deal With MN AG...
From Giggle Box to Hanky Time: Dem. Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta Gets a...
Sam Stein Overlooks Tim Scott While Worrying It’ll Be ‘Another 100 Years’ Before...
Kathy Griffin Wants You to Feel Rage on Election Day Over Arrest of...
Disney Cruise Families Stunned by Onboard Arrests — The Shocking Reason Border Patrol...
Rep. Steve Cohen Says Tennessee's Insane New Maps Would Destroy the Black Community's...
Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes: Krassenstein Canceled by His Own Side for...
The Bulwark Floats the Idea of Graham Platner Running for President in 2028
'Go to Gaza Yourself': Man Urges Gay Pro-Palestine Protester to Experience Hamas 'Hospital...
AOC Is Thinking About How Black Americans Created Democracy in This Country From...
Yet Another Gen Z Dweeb Declares 'The Rule of Law Is Dead' Because...
Our Sides Are Splitting! Jen Psaki Claims Democrats Don't Choose Nominees in a...
No, AOC: You Big DUMMY Can't Earn a Billion Dollars — But Brilliant...
Kamala Harris Wants DNC to Release It's 2024 Campaign 'Autopsy Report' but X...
Hear That Sound? It's Millions of Democrats CRYING OUT Over Sean Spicer's Recent...

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement