Jake Tapper: Don’t Rush to Assign Motive to Synagogue-Ramming Muslim Man Who Opened...
MSNOW Blames Trump for U.S. Terror Attacks, Not the Dangerous Islamists Who Carried...
Seth Meyers Ridicules ‘Meat-Constipated’ Pete Hegseth With Assist From Jen Psaki Clip
Silent Spud: CNN’s Brian ‘Tater’ Stelter Avoids Addressing the Media Malpractice at His...
Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney Blames 'Cult of Gun Absolutism' for Old Dominion Shooting
Not Shocking: Regular Churchgoers Thrive Mentally While Secular Liberals Struggle Most
Reporter Makes a Funny Out of Mamdani’s Wife Liking Posts About October 7
Dave Portnoy to Mamdani: Drop the Fake Horror—Your Wife's Probably Celebrating These Attac...
Three Norwegian Citizens 'With Links to Iraq' Bomb US Embassy in Oslo
Zohran Mamdani Dragged on X for Statement on Michigan Synagogue Attack
Three Salvadoran Nationals Charged With Possession of Molotov Cocktails in NYC
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand Demands Sen. Tommy Tuberville Apologize for Islamophobic Post
Vehicle Used in Attack on Synagogue Registered to US Citizen From Lebanon Who...
Trump Derangement Syndrome: Ed Krassenstein Cheers China's Ridicule of White House Prayer...
MS NOW Hosts Wonder If the Michigan Synagogue Attack Is the Fault of......

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement