Pesky Past: Gavin Newsom Wants Everyone to Treat Platner’s Senate Implosion Like It’s...
Possible Platner Replacer Troy Jackson Says the Disgraced Maine Senate Nom Lied to...
Cope Harder: We're Back to Trump Is a Rapist and Pete Hegseth Has...
Kyle Kulinski Tells Republicans to Sit at the Kids’ Table While the Adults...
Noah Smith: That Dems Booted Platner Shows They Have Morals While Republicans Are...
Zohran Mamdani Grabs a Shovel and Helps Break Ground on 2 WTC Just...
Cops Threaten to Ticket Christian Street Preacher If Someone Claims They're Offended by...
Dear Hollywood: Stop Imagining Fake, Racist Scenarios and Hurting Your Own Feelings
Judge Sparkle Rejects Court Order Dismissing Her Ruling Against Election Integrity Measure
Mexico’s President to Pursue Legal Action Against US After ICE Shoots Mexican Illegal
Current Maine SOS Announces Her Bid to Replace Platner — Gets Attacked by...
Zohran Mamdani Calls to Abolish ICE After Illegal Shot While Trying to Run...
Irish Police Warn Against 'Right-Wing US Backlash' As Pro-Palestine Mom Is Killed by...
California Election Fraud Explosion Catches Dems in the Act
Drop Site News Deletes Post Insinuating Graham Platner’s Victim Was Asking for It...

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos