NASA’s Missing Scientists Mystery Is Getting Way Too Real
John Harwood Gets Introduced to Himself After Questioning the Objectivity of a CBS...
Trump Made Sure Schumer Will NEVER Recover From That Mistake
Bill Kristol Is Officially So Totally and Completely Broken It's Not Even Worth...
Pete Buttigieg Says Majority Agrees With Dems Despite What Algorithms Indicate (THIS Is...
Greg Gutfeld Shreds Jessica Tarlov in VICIOUS Back and Forth About SPLC Funding...
Media (and Dems) Don't Mind Anonymous Sources for Hit Pieces but NOT When...
SHOCK FOOTAGE: Fairfax Democrat Caught on Video STEALING Vote No Info From Election...
FBI Gets Some Other Tips After Arresting US Soldier Accused of Insider Trading...
DAMNING Thread BUSTS Spanberger for Being Even SHADIER in Redistricting (GUESS What She...
Here Are 3 Calif. Economic Comparisons to the Nat'l Average That Gavin Newsom...
'TIRED of the SWAMP!' Rep. Brandon Gill DOG-WALKS John Cornyn and His (Spanish)...
If You Donate to Harvard's 'Viewpoint Diversity' Scam, You Are Probably Dumb Enough...
Hero or Hustler? Special Forces Operator Busted for Wagering (and Winning Big) On...
Hakeem Jeffries Can’t Quit Ron DeSantis — Calls Him Boring While He Sounds...

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos