Moob Swings: Man-Breasted Democrat George Conway Laughably Claims Trump Has Low Testostero...
Law Prof Butthurt That Trump Fired New US Attorney an Hour After He...
Body Discovered Inside Ayanna Pressley’s Million-Dollar House Owned by Her Ex-Con Husband
Immigration Officials Allowed to Consider Use of Benefits When Granting Permanent Legal St...
How the Tables Turn: Andrew & Tristan Tate Busted in Miami Right Before...
Mehdi Hasan Triggered by Marco Rubio's Speech on Far-Left Violence
The AP Tracks Down Ex-Wife of ICE Agent in Its Video of 'What...
Jesse Kelly Was Right: Europeans Visit America for the World Cup and Realize...
'Abolish Rent' Author Says Rent Is Paid ‘At the Barrel of a Gun’...
JJ Watt Proves He’s the GOAT: Turns a Fan’s ‘What If’ into Beers...
Boston Globe: Woman Came to Boston for Noah Kahan Concert and Now She's...
Mamdani Holding 'Active Conversation' on Legality of Arresting Netanyahu at the UN This...
Canadian Fire Chief Opens Wildfire Update With a Land Acknowledgement, Coughing Americans...
Election Integrity Explained by (Checks Notes) Olive Garden
Marco Rubio Delivers a Blistering Speech Against Communism and Far-Left Political Violence

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement