The New York Times posted a report about how a ban on trophy hunting has destroyed a primary source of income for an African village.
A hunting ban saps an African village's livelihood http://t.co/hxDUdTvpeF pic.twitter.com/NsE9B3uffo
— The New York Times (@nytimes) September 13, 2015
Shocking development!
https://twitter.com/tooljunkies73/status/643082663197171712
https://twitter.com/BobbyMooreBFK/status/643083181344878592
Yes, and something that the outrage mob didn’t want to hear when they were hyperventilating over the death of Cecil the Lion.
https://twitter.com/instapundit/status/643098461483593728
Nobody could have seen that coming. https://t.co/ch879OcEZX
— Evan Meyer (@pythonrocksnake) September 13, 2015
Unintended consequences strike again. https://t.co/MhOC5wQtXB
— Douglas T (@Douglas_T) September 13, 2015
The political elites make decisions based on how they feel things should be in their idealistic, utopian society, regardless of whether there’s any logic or reality involved.
@nytimes The left again…..not thinking things through. Just going by the emotions on decision making, as usual they always do.
— Roger That (@WatchTheBias) September 13, 2015
Recommended
@nytimes Hey, but that's OK isn't it? Because animals are more important than humans? Where are all the anti-hunters helping these people?
— Captain of the Gravy Boat (@BigAlFishes) September 13, 2015
Nowhere to be found.
Cc @peta https://t.co/jpiNK5eg1o
— Greg Pollowitz (@GPollowitz) September 13, 2015
@nytimes Just give the lions and leopards cute names and then they won't hurt anyone.
— Helen (@imladrisHB) September 13, 2015
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member