'Rimshot': Johnny Manziel's inaccuracy zinged with 'cold' comparison

Johnny Manziel is making his first NFL start today, and he hasn’t been very accurate so far.

Cmon Manziel. Find some kind of accuracy.

— Que (@rightonQuelive) December 14, 2014

https://twitter.com/JR_Fantasy/status/544205654479478785

https://twitter.com/Joe_Forlenza/status/544208874849726465

What else hasn’t been very accurate lately? Oh yeah.

Johnny Manziel is less accurate than Rolling Stone.

— NotKennyRogers (@NotKennyRogers) December 14, 2014

That's cold: RT @NotKennyRogers Johnny Manziel is less accurate than Rolling Stone.

— John L. Pitts (@JohnLPitts) December 14, 2014

https://twitter.com/J_Pwrs/status/544210692501295104

Related:

‘Buzzfeed journalism, yo’: Are they trying to outdo Rolling Stone?

This ‘legendary’ fact-checking flashback is TOO good

The fact-check review at Rolling Stone is ‘like an IRS audit’

Feminist refuses to abandon the sinking ship Rolling Stone rape story

‘Journalism dysfunction’: Rolling Stone under fire for UVA gang rape story

Rolling Stone updates its UVA-rape story: ‘Our trust in her was misplaced’

#AngryLambchop Christopher Hayes adds his own ‘f*** you’ to Rolling Stone

‘Hoo boy’: These tweets are coming back to haunt disgraced Rolling Stone journo

Jessica Valenti: ‘Well f*** you very much, @RollingStone’