BOMBSHELL: MI Senate Dem’s Campaign Staffer Busted in Hamas-Linked Threat Plot Against UM...
Pentagon on Lockdown, Trump Striking Iran, Seizing Kharg Island?
Kimmel and TMZ Tried Again to Mock Spencer Pratt and Ended Up Accidentally...
VP Vance’s Next-Level Fearless Move: Battle-Tested Veteran Set to Face the Shrews of...
'I've Watched That 67 Times'! Here's Our Anti-ICE Loon FAFO of the Day
ABC News Journo Reports Susan Collins Has Pounced on the Platner Allegations (and...
The Left Has Found Their World Cup Hero: a Somali Referee With Ties...
Nancy Mace Goes Nuclear: Brutal Brother-Marriage Roast After Ilhan Omar Mocks Her Primary...
Ron Klain Pivots From Vouching for Biden's Cognitive State to Whitewashing Graham Platner'...
Predator App Patron Platner’s New Plan: Hammer the Epstein Class and Pray Voters...
Presidential Pool Party: While the Left Screeches, Trump Welcomes Workers Into the Oval...
Professor Calls Military Flyovers 'Weird and a Little Creepy' — Gets Absolutely Ratioed...
NY Times' 'Me Too' Journo Explains Why the Platner Allegations Are 'D'ifferent ('but...
Retired Danish Politician Drops World Cup Directive for Americans: 'For God's Sake, Don't...
Jerry Seinfeld Shuts Down Free Palestine Streamer With BRUTAL Reality Check and We...

In one retweet, David Limbaugh shows the difference between leftist and conservative approaches to censorship

In a few words, David Limbaugh is able to turn the kind of leftist thinking exhibited in the clip he retweeted on its head. When someone on the Left starts advocating for reducing the “capability of conservative influencers” to reach audiences, it’s important to remember that most on the right, such as Limbaugh, do not seek the same outcome for those ideologically far apart from them.

Advertisement

Despite the rhetoric in the clip he retweeted, which is clearly attacking the First Amendment, Limbaugh refuses to advocate for silencing those on the Left.

The sad part is that a defense of commentators and pundits (on either side) being able to make ideologically-based arguments without fear of being censored even needs to be stated.

Advertisement

Has it not been proven time and again (for nearly 250 years) that the constitutionally-prescribed philosophy of more speech, not less, is much better at producing reasonable rhetoric than censorship and repression?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement