Hillary Clinton Remains Angry and Bitter About Losing in 2016 (the Constitution Is...
'Saved You a CLICK': Justine Bateman BLISTERS The Atlantic for Hating on World...
Four Ex-Presidents Brag 'Zero Drama' BUUUUT X Delivers the Receipts
AWKWARD --> See if You Can Guess What Ruben Gallego and Eric Swalwell...
MS NOW Asked a Platner Adviser If More Accusers Will Come Forward, and...
Johnson Sees Democratic Primary Results Boosting GOP Midterm Chances
'White Girls Are SLAGS': Thread Shares More HORRIFIC Deets of UK Girls Assaulted...
Dem Rep. Debbie Dingell Tells CNN the Only Thing Her Constituents Are Talking...
Don't Look Now BUT David Friedberg Just Ratioed TF Out of WEALTHY Ro...
A CLEAR Link! Rupert Lowe SHREDS Muslims Claiming He's Racist for 'Targeting' THEM...
'Dems Have NO Standards'! Guess Why Cory Booker Is Willing to Overlook Graham...
Keir Starmer Just Quit: Britain’s 'Landslide' PM Lasts Less Than Two Years Before...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Senator Ossoff's Disgrace: Campaigning with Despicable Lies from the Pulpit on Father's Da...
Reid, White, and Blue: Ex-MSNBC Host Says This Fourth Will Be Joy-Less and...

No big deal, just fired FBI Dep. Dir. Andrew McCabe asking for an immunity deal for some reason

You can’t make this up…

Andrew McCabe, the now former FBI Deputy Director who was fired earlier this year, is now seeking immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony in front of Congress:

Advertisement

So the first person to flip in the Russian investigation will be [SPINS WHEEL] Andrew McCabe?

More from CNN:

“Mr. McCabe is willing to testify, but because of the criminal referral, he must be afforded suitable legal protection,” Bromwich wrote to Grassley. “This is a textbook case for granting use immunity. . . . If this Committee is unwilling or unable to obtain such an order, then Mr. McCabe will have to no choice but to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.”

If McCabe invokes his Fifth Amendment right instead of answering certain questions, it could set up a contentious confrontation with lawmakers. They could serve him with a subpoena and if he continues to refuse to testify, lawmakers could pursue a contempt resolution against him and refer the matter for prosecution by the DC US Attorney’s Office or enforce the subpoena through civil action in federal court.

Advertisement

Get the popcorn, all of it:

Exit question: Should he return his legal fund windfall if this happens?

And this comes on the heels of another report that controversial FBI agent Peter Strzok may have played a “larger role in Clinton and Russia probes than previously known”:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement