LOVE to See It! Elon Musk's MOM Maye Musk Takes Harry Sisson and...
NO Enthusiasm: David Axelrod's HONESTY Could be the End of Kamala's Terrible, Horrible,...
FATALITY! Megyn Kelly ENDS Bulwarker Tim Miller for Bringing Up HER KIDS in...
New REPORT Shows Kamala Used TAX DOLLARS to Pay U.N. Officials to Help...
Grammy-Winning Music Producer, Film Composer Quincy Jones Dead at 91
CNN Anchor Kasie Hunt Has a Fair & Balanced Summary of Tomorrow's Election...
Kamala Supporters Asked to Put Their Money Where Their Big Mouths Are With...
No, Desperate, Moronic Kamala Supporters, Abortion Laws Do NOT Ban Ectopic Pregnancies ......
We Have a Country to Save
She's Gonna BLOOOW! Scott Jennings Drives CNN Analyst Into VISIBLE Breakdown Debating Poli...
CBS News' Steps on a 'Journalism' Rake Warning About False Claims Ahead of...
HATE TV --> PANICKED Joe Scarborough Goes After Trump Supporters' PARENTS in Bizarre...
GRRL BYE! Kamala DODGING Question on CA Prop-36 Because 'It's Sunday Before the...
'SUCK IT, NBC!' NBC Forced to Give Trump Free Ad DURING Sunday Night...
Bridget Phetasy Lays Out Why Trump Is the ONLY Choice This Election (Even...

HAHAHAHA -- (takes breath) -- HAHAHAHA: New York Times issues embarrassing correction on the Electoral College

This is pretty funny.

The New York Times called for an end to the Electoral College in an editorial on December 19, calling it a “living symbol of America’s original sin.” But the paper was forced to issue an embarrassing correction when the editors all of a sudden remembered that they used to support the Electoral College. Even worse for the Times? That support came in 2000 when another Republican president lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College:

Advertisement
Correction: December 20, 2016

An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that the editorial board has been opposed to the Electoral College going back 80 years. It failed to note an exception: in 2000, the board defended the college after the election of George W. Bush.

Whoops!

The 2000 editorial was titled, “The Case for the Electoral College” and the editors argued that, “The Electoral College was first and foremost a compact among states, large and small, designed to ensure that one state or one region did not dominate the others.”

The Times ended the editorial with:

The system has survived earlier instances in which the winner of the popular vote was denied the presidency. Wise voters and legislators will want to make sure that it survives this one as well.

So, what’s changed?

***

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement