FIFA to Allow Rainbow Flags at Seattle’s ‘Pride Match’ Between Iran and Egypt...
Team Newsom Tried and Failed to Convince SCOTUS There's a Grocery Store Exception...
Deleted Tweet Alert: Phoenix Mercury Mocks Caitlin Clark After Its Players Maul and...
Krystal Ball Can’t Believe Antifa Terrorist Faces Jail ‘For Having Leftist Reading Materia...
We Saw It, So You Have To: Abdul El-Sayed Dances to Whitney Houston...
Tara Palmeri’s ‘My Notes Disagree’ Defense After Betraying Kat Cammack Is Peak Media...
Anti-Semite Hasan Piker Goes on Foul-Mouthed Rant, Vows to Destroy Rep. Ritchie Torres...
Guess What Dems Are Saying About Haiti Now After Clutching Pearls When Trump...
Scott Jennings Turns NY Lefty Into Sputtering MESS Asking Why a Coffee Shop...
Welcome to Congress, Comrade: Darializa Avila Chevalier Refuses to Disavow Communism
'Let Us Know How it GOES': Dan Bongino's BRUTAL Letter to Socialists Hits...
DON'T You Point Your Finger AT ME! Hearing ERUPTS as DHS Sec. Mullin...
Hakeem Jeffries Caught: His Future Is Ruined
Elizabeth Warren's on the Warpath After SCOTUS Allows Trump to Enforce the 'T'...
Hakeem Jeffries' Horrible, Terrible, No-Good, VERY BAD Week Just Got Worse As CNBC...

What we know now about the IG investigations into Hillary Clinton's emails (Hint: It's not any better for Hillary)

Here’s what we know now on the story of a possible criminal investigation (as reported by the New York Times late last night) into the handling of emails by the State Department and Hillary Clinton.

Advertisement

The inspectors general for the intelligence community (IC) and State Department are now saying this was a “counterintelligence referral, not criminal” which contradicts what the NYT reported earlier:

But this “counterintelligence referral” is still a big deal and was prompted by government investigators discovering potentially classified emails on Hillary Clinton’s private server as well as the thumb drive of Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall:

Advertisement

In other words:

Exactly. And contrary to what Team Hillary wants you to believe, this story isn’t going away:

It should be noted that the New York Times article from last night, written by Michael S. Schmidt and Matt Apuzzo, still has the “Criminal Inquiry” headline:

NYT_1

Will the NYT change the headline? It doesn’t look like it…

A new article by Schmidt and Apuzzo was just posted to NYTimes.com where they write, “Regardless of the terminology, the referral raises the possibility of a Justice Department criminal investigation” and that it was the DOJ that called this a “criminal referral” in the first place:

Advertisement

NYT_2

John Sexton of Breitbart News adds a little more clarity to the whole “criminal” vs. “counterintelligence” debate:

The NYT also responded to David Brock’s call for the Times to launch an internal investigation into its “flawed” reporting on Hillary Clinton:

David Brock is a partisan. It is not surprising that he is unhappy with some of our aggressive coverage of important political figures. We are proud of that coverage and obviously disagree with his opinion.

We shall see if the “aggressive coverage” continues or if the paper cracks under pressure from Clinton and her minions.

Advertisement

***

Related:

‘Orange is the new pantsuit’: DOJ asked to open criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email account

‘Wrong’: Ron Fournier demolishes Hillary Clinton’s email excuses & scapegoats

Pathetic: Hillary Clinton’s campaign ‘steamrolled NYT for a rewrite’ (and got it)

What makes Hillary Clinton’s rapid response steamrolling of NYT even worse? THIS shattering perspective

‘OH SNAP!’ Actor Adam Baldwin sums up just how foul Hillary Clinton is with only 3 letters

‘They have a criminal referral’: Rep. Cummings’ spin for Hillary brought to an abrupt halt

So Good: ‘BOOM!’ This GIF nutshells (emphasis on nut) media’s lapdoggery for Hillary Clinton

Crazy from the heat: Hillary just blamed WHAT for her email deception? (Brace yourselves!)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos