Try Locking Up the CRIMINALS Instead! Walgreens CEO Says Shoplifting Prevention Led to...
KJP Dismisses State Dept. Spox As 'Random Person' to Avoid Crediting Trump for...
California Dreamin': How the Left Destroyed Life in the Golden State
Karine Jean-Pierre Ends Tenure as Mouthpiece for the King of Lies
CRY HARDER, Chucky! Schumer Warns Trump's Energy Secretary Is a Fossil Fuel Executive...
A Desperate Plea from a Fellow Mom of Redheads: Join Me in Praying...
Hits Us DIRECTLY in the Feels: Twitter User Shares Heartwarming Story About L.A....
Pam Bondi Tells Sen. Alex Padilla She Will Not Be Bullied by Him
Is the Pope Catholic? No, We're Really Asking: Check Out What Pope Francis...
'Is That a Joke?' Biden Asked If He or Trump Should Get Credit...
'Pure Savage!' GOP Rep Uses His Phone to Test Witness' Claim SSA Telework...
Ivy Beleaguered: J.D. Vance HUMILIATES Yale Professor Who Claims Pete Hegseth Will Destroy...
RFK Jr.'s Warning Heeded - FDA to Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3...
The Stupid, It BURNS! Lefty Attacks Homeschooling, Proves HE'S the Dim Bulb Instead
Corrupt to the Core: Stacey Abrams Nonprofit Led by Ralph Warnock Admitted to...

Did the American Enterprise Institute just nuke Roger Goodell and the #Deflategate Wells Report? Hint: Yes!

If you’re a Tom Brady and New England Patriots fans, your new best friend is the American Enterprise Institute who just might have exonerated the star QB of charges that he intentionally deflated footballs before last year’s playoff game with the Indianapolis Colts.

Advertisement

From Sally Jenkins in the Washington Post:

The NFL paid millions for a fundamentally flawed report by lawyer Ted Wells that made Brady and the Patriots out to be slam-dunk guilty, based on more than 100 pages of mathematical analysis of ball pressurization . . . that turns out to be erroneous. The AEI’s report totally rejects the finding that the footballs used by the Patriots in the AFC championship game had a significant drop in air pressure compared with those used by the Colts. But the truly damning sentence is this one, buried in its erudite phrasings and equations: “The Wells report’s statistical analysis cannot be replicated by performing the analysis as described in the report,” the AEI concludes.

Basically, the math didn’t add up. It’s a standard principle in science: If you can’t replicate a set of results, then there is a problem with it. A flaw or a fraud is at work. Either you made a mistake, or you made it up.

When the AEI analysts looked more closely at how such a mistake could have been made, what they found “astonished” them, says the report’s co-author Stan Veuger. The Wells report “relies on an unorthodox statistical procedure at odds with the methodology the report describes.” Translation: The Wells report said it would use one equation but then used a different (and weird) equation to arrive at its numbers.

“It was really clumsy,” Veuger says. “It’s the kind of mistake you’d see in freshman statistics class.”

Advertisement

LOL. Goodbye, Goodell!

https://twitter.com/WillReeveJr/status/611374894299766784

Brady’s appeal hearing is set for June 23. Get the popcorn, because it’s going to be a doozy.

***

Related:

Twitchy coverage of #DeflateGate

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement