I'd Like to Teach the World to CRINGE! New AI Coca-Cola Ad Has...
CRUEL Britannia! Care Worker Jailed NINE MONTHS for 'Crime' of Filming Riot Aftermath
Trump Just Crossed an Election Threshold That's a 'First Ever for a Republican...
X Marks the Ad Spot! Big Win for Elon Musk and Free Speech...
'Move the F**K On': Justine Bateman Goes OFF on Scolds Lecturing Her About...
Censorship Loving 'Journalist' Jen Psaki Says We Need LAWS to Stop People Getting...
Hochul's Highway Heist: NY Governor's 'New Math' Is a Total Toll Trick
Democrats Form Shadow Government to Stop Trump!
AOC Explaining What Trump Supporters Think to Joy Reid is LITERALLY the Dumb...
ALL the Shade! Straight-FIRE Post Looks Back at Just How UNQUALIFIED Biden's Nominees...
Here Are Reminders About What People Calling RFK Jr. a Conspiracy Theorist Considered...
How Donald Trump Destroyed 'The View,' CNN, and MSNBC
Just WOW: What Chris Hayes' Guest Called Pete Hegseth Has People DEMANDING He...
YES! Jake Tapper Accidentally Gives Trump's Picks an EPIC New Nickname While Clutching...
Lying liar Whoopi Tries to Slander a Hometown Bakery, but Her Story Is...

Did the American Enterprise Institute just nuke Roger Goodell and the #Deflategate Wells Report? Hint: Yes!

If you’re a Tom Brady and New England Patriots fans, your new best friend is the American Enterprise Institute who just might have exonerated the star QB of charges that he intentionally deflated footballs before last year’s playoff game with the Indianapolis Colts.

Advertisement

From Sally Jenkins in the Washington Post:

The NFL paid millions for a fundamentally flawed report by lawyer Ted Wells that made Brady and the Patriots out to be slam-dunk guilty, based on more than 100 pages of mathematical analysis of ball pressurization . . . that turns out to be erroneous. The AEI’s report totally rejects the finding that the footballs used by the Patriots in the AFC championship game had a significant drop in air pressure compared with those used by the Colts. But the truly damning sentence is this one, buried in its erudite phrasings and equations: “The Wells report’s statistical analysis cannot be replicated by performing the analysis as described in the report,” the AEI concludes.

Basically, the math didn’t add up. It’s a standard principle in science: If you can’t replicate a set of results, then there is a problem with it. A flaw or a fraud is at work. Either you made a mistake, or you made it up.

When the AEI analysts looked more closely at how such a mistake could have been made, what they found “astonished” them, says the report’s co-author Stan Veuger. The Wells report “relies on an unorthodox statistical procedure at odds with the methodology the report describes.” Translation: The Wells report said it would use one equation but then used a different (and weird) equation to arrive at its numbers.

“It was really clumsy,” Veuger says. “It’s the kind of mistake you’d see in freshman statistics class.”

Advertisement

LOL. Goodbye, Goodell!

https://twitter.com/WillReeveJr/status/611374894299766784

Brady’s appeal hearing is set for June 23. Get the popcorn, because it’s going to be a doozy.

***

Related:

Twitchy coverage of #DeflateGate

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement