Unlikely Hero: Bee Guy Has Diamondbacks Baseball Fans Absolutely Buzzing
VP Kamala Harris Posts About Trusting Women and It Goes HILARIOUSLY Wrong
'Glory to All Our Martyrs': Columbia Protesters Take Over Hamilton Hall
VIP: Where Are All The Feminists? J.K. Rowling And Others Are Yelling But...
Rep. Matt Gaetz Pushes Defense Secretary on 'Boots on the Ground' in Gaza
AOC Lashes Out at Mayor Eric Adams After He Promises to Intervene in...
DHS Data Reveals Hundreds of Thousands of Migrants Have Been Flown in on...
South Carolina Medicaid Office Caught Red-handed Distributing Voter Registration Forms to...
Illegal Immigrants Take Over Seattle City Park, Put Out Supply Requests
UNC Student's Beautiful Thread About Protecting Our Flag From Pro-Hamas 'Protesters' Will...
Freedom of the Press VASTLY More Important Than Suppressing 'False Information'
Bloviating Bore, Norman Finkelstein Links Gaza Protests to Himself
Four Teens, One a Football Star, Killed When Their SUV Is Stopped by...
Mayor Pete? Elon? Kent Police Department's TERRIBLE Police Sketch Sparks Hilarious Specula...
Projection Overload! Ilhan Omar Accuses GOP of Putting Hamas Protesters in Danger and...

Did the American Enterprise Institute just nuke Roger Goodell and the #Deflategate Wells Report? Hint: Yes!

If you’re a Tom Brady and New England Patriots fans, your new best friend is the American Enterprise Institute who just might have exonerated the star QB of charges that he intentionally deflated footballs before last year’s playoff game with the Indianapolis Colts.

Advertisement

From Sally Jenkins in the Washington Post:

The NFL paid millions for a fundamentally flawed report by lawyer Ted Wells that made Brady and the Patriots out to be slam-dunk guilty, based on more than 100 pages of mathematical analysis of ball pressurization . . . that turns out to be erroneous. The AEI’s report totally rejects the finding that the footballs used by the Patriots in the AFC championship game had a significant drop in air pressure compared with those used by the Colts. But the truly damning sentence is this one, buried in its erudite phrasings and equations: “The Wells report’s statistical analysis cannot be replicated by performing the analysis as described in the report,” the AEI concludes.

Basically, the math didn’t add up. It’s a standard principle in science: If you can’t replicate a set of results, then there is a problem with it. A flaw or a fraud is at work. Either you made a mistake, or you made it up.

When the AEI analysts looked more closely at how such a mistake could have been made, what they found “astonished” them, says the report’s co-author Stan Veuger. The Wells report “relies on an unorthodox statistical procedure at odds with the methodology the report describes.” Translation: The Wells report said it would use one equation but then used a different (and weird) equation to arrive at its numbers.

“It was really clumsy,” Veuger says. “It’s the kind of mistake you’d see in freshman statistics class.”

Advertisement

LOL. Goodbye, Goodell!

https://twitter.com/WillReeveJr/status/611374894299766784

Brady’s appeal hearing is set for June 23. Get the popcorn, because it’s going to be a doozy.

***

Related:

Twitchy coverage of #DeflateGate

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement