Report: Yes, Trump 'Plans to Fire the Entire Team' VERY Soon (Brace for...
Never Let The Truth Get In the Way of a Good Story: CBS...
Musk See TV: Elon Eyes Possible Purchase of Floundering MSNBC from Comcast
The End is Near: Axios Leader Screams Into Void as Darkness Engulfs Dying...
Hero Secret Service Agent Reflects on 61st Anniversary of JFK Assassination
Hello PROJECTION! Joy Reid Says Your Trump Supporting, Democracy-Ending Family Will 'Turn...
When Government Grants You the 'Right' to Die, They Will Eventually Give You...
Forgive Us If We Don't Shed a Tear Over Rachel Maddow Getting a...
Georgetown Law in HOT Water After Denying Pregnant Mom Exam Accommodations
ABSOLUTELY NOT! Democratic Senator Peter Welch Wants to Restore Funding for Terror-Loving...
JOY! Trans Activist Says LGBTQ People Need Guns to Threaten Women Who Won't...
Massive Hypocrite David Axelrod Bemoans Trump Possibly Politicizing the DOJ ... Just Like...
Take Heart, Florida Woman Pam Bondi was Made in 'The Swamp' and is...
Eric Adams Sounds Positively Sensible Calling for 'Involuntary' Removal of Dangerous Peopl...
Adam Schiff Has a 'Justice Denied' Hissy Fit After News Breaks About Trump's...

Univ. of Wash. professor challenges the CDC over the 5-day isolation requirement

Carl Bergstrom, a professor at the University of Washington whose work on COVID-19 has been widely cited in the media from nearly Day One of the pandemic, is challenging the new CDC guidelines that “reduced the isolation period after a positive test from 10 days to 5 days for asymptomatic individuals.”

Advertisement

“I like the idea of allowing people to exit isolation earlier than after ten days, but doing so without one or more negative tests seems odd,” he said:

Whispers: There are no tests because the Biden administration did not prioritize tests:

Bergstrom then argued that the reason testing is so important is that there is a  “broad range of infectious periods, with a non-trivial fraction going well beyond five days”:

Even the scientists don’t believe the CDC when they say it was based on science?

Advertisement

Show your work, CDC!

Bergstrom also pointed out that the language from the CDC is confusing. Here the CDC says “if asymptomatic”:

But, later on, the CDC talks about symptoms “that are resolving” which isn’t the same thing:

He ended the thread with this criticism of Dr. Fauci in that video we just told you about:

Advertisement

And if it’s not clear yet, he’s mocking the CDC:

https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1475807701686882309

https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1475713334485794816

https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1475707838391472131

Maybe it’s because we’re still in the Christmas hangover phase of the news cycle, but the CDC change is not going the way Team Biden hoped it would go:

To be continued. . .

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement