The New York Times has an article up where they interviewed people in Pennsylvania to give readers a sense of who exactly is going to decide the election in a few days. And of all the people they could have highlighted, they picked a convicted felon and sex offender as one of their pro-Trump examples:

It’s an awful crime, too:

Ryan Reilly of HuffPost called the Times out for it, too: “associating an unhoused registered sex offender with either candidate, in a piece meant to give NYT readers a snapshot of Pennsylvania voters, seems unfair.”

The NYT has since removed this blurb from the report:


Tags: nytTrump