Newsom and Jeffries Realize They Can't Stop Trump's Plan to Crush Democrats
'Shattered Fundraising Records'! Dems' Unhinged Rhetoric Is Working Out Great... for the N...
A 'YUGE' Endorsement: Trump Comes Out in Support of Spencer Pratt, Slams Clown...
WaPo Stomps on a Rake While Alleging Another Outlet's 'Contentious Layoffs' and 'Dwindling...
Joyce Carol Oates Calls Bluesky an ‘Upscale Mall’ — Conservatives Say That’s Exactly...
Dem Sen. Gillibrand Told Sean Duffy She'd Never Flown on Private Jets but...
Carlson Urges Massie to Heroically Name Epstein Names; Replies: ‘Remember What Happened La...
Dem Adviser: What Platner Bragged About Doing Makes Him More Relatable (Apparently Liz...
Former U.S. Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts, Key Architect of Dodd-Frank Act, Dies...
Dem Senate Candidate Graham Platner Mocked Purple Heart Hero: 'Dumb [Expletive] Didn’t Des...
A Glance at Some of the People Upset Thomas Massie Lost Speaks Volumes
It's a Cringe-Off! Gavin Newsom and JB Pritzker Battle Each Other for WORST...
MAGA Vs. Massie: Scott Jennings Delivers Kentucky Republican Incumbent’s Primary Post-Mort...
'Epstein Class': Ro Khanna Flirts With Antisemitism
DC Councilwoman Agrees Curfews Are a ‘Dangerous’ Way to Deal With Teen Takeovers

Official licensed NFL mask: 'This face covering is not intended to prevent or protect from any form of illness or disease (or otherwise)'

The NFL will reportedly require all fans to wear masks if/when games resume this fall:

Advertisement

How exactly are they going to enforce this?

Who needs to go to games anyway:

It this kind of mask okay?

We only ask because officially licensed masks, like this one, don’t sound much better: “This face covering is not intended to prevent or protect from any form of illness or disease (or otherwise)”:

Here’s the warning they give:

As for the effectiveness of cloth masks like this, the jury is still out. But the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy nows says they’re “better than doing nothing”:

The authors and CIDRAP have received requests in recent weeks to remove this article from the CIDRAP website. Reasons have included: (1) we don’t truly know that cloth masks (face coverings) are not effective, since the data are so limited, (2) wearing a cloth mask or face covering is better than doing nothing, (3) the article is being used by individuals and groups to support non-mask wearing where mandated and (4) there are now many modeling studies suggesting that cloth masks or face coverings could be effective at flattening the curve and preventing many cases of infection.

Advertisement

You know, maybe we’re putting too much faith in masks to stop this thing? Just a thought:

Also, it appears this mask requirement doesn’t apply equally:

Of course not.

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement