CNN Cuts CLIP of Democrat RIGHT Before He Fantasizes About Executing Pete Hegseth...
Elizabeth Warren's Effort to Convince Americans SCOTUS Crushed Their Right to Vote Gets...
Unleash HELL! Smug Harvard Prof Goes After Ben Sasse About Babies and WOW,...
'Lost': MS NOW Asked Young WI Peeps to Describe the Democratic Party in...
JB Pritzker Trips Over a Stack of Maps While Slamming SCOTUS' Racial Gerrymandering...
PULVERIZED! Scott Jennings BLISTERS CNN Analyst Claiming GOP Would NEVER Elect a Black...
Rep. Jasmine Crockett Is One the Most Powerful People in the Country So...
BREAKING: Maine Gov. Janet Mills Suspending Her Candidacy for the U.S. Senate (Statement)
AOC Goes Straight Fatal-Attraction NUTS When Lee Zeldin Says He's Done With Her...
OOF! Stephen A. Smith's Poll About Violent Political Rhetoric Does NOT GO WELL...
'They Not Like Us': Spencer Pratt's New Campaign Ad for LA Mayoral Race...
Cowntraversy: Google Street Values Your Privacy, if You're a Cow
A Murder of Jim Crows: Schumer and Dems Ignorantly Invoke Segregation Laws As...
WaPo: White House Ballroom Will Set in Stone Trump’s ‘Regal Conception of the...
Map Flap: CNN’s Laura Coates Calls SCOTUS VRA Ruling ‘Illogical’ As Dems Double...

Official licensed NFL mask: 'This face covering is not intended to prevent or protect from any form of illness or disease (or otherwise)'

The NFL will reportedly require all fans to wear masks if/when games resume this fall:

Advertisement

How exactly are they going to enforce this?

Who needs to go to games anyway:

It this kind of mask okay?

We only ask because officially licensed masks, like this one, don’t sound much better: “This face covering is not intended to prevent or protect from any form of illness or disease (or otherwise)”:

Here’s the warning they give:

As for the effectiveness of cloth masks like this, the jury is still out. But the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy nows says they’re “better than doing nothing”:

The authors and CIDRAP have received requests in recent weeks to remove this article from the CIDRAP website. Reasons have included: (1) we don’t truly know that cloth masks (face coverings) are not effective, since the data are so limited, (2) wearing a cloth mask or face covering is better than doing nothing, (3) the article is being used by individuals and groups to support non-mask wearing where mandated and (4) there are now many modeling studies suggesting that cloth masks or face coverings could be effective at flattening the curve and preventing many cases of infection.

Advertisement

You know, maybe we’re putting too much faith in masks to stop this thing? Just a thought:

Also, it appears this mask requirement doesn’t apply equally:

Of course not.

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos