Protesters Say Dexter Reed Was Shot, Assassinated, and Overly-Killed
Brian Stelter Concerned Pro-Trump Propaganda Media Will Publicize Jurors
Sunny Hostin of 'The View' Fears a Trump Supporter Will 'Sneak' Onto the...
Woman Complains That Men Do Nothing When 'Abusive Drug-Addled Bum' Terrorizes Train Car
Pallywood: Palestinian Women Devastated at the Loss of a Loved One in Gaza
BREAKING: Washington Post Writer Doesn't Read The Washington Post
A Constitutional Crisis of the Democrats' Making
Elon Musk Calls NPR CEO Katherine Maher 'One of the Worst Human Beings...
Check Out These Highlights of Columbia President Beclowning Herself During Congressional H...
President Joe Biden Warns the Israelis Not to Attack Israel
SPOILED: NYC Illegal Immigrant Complains Free Food, Housing Not Good Enough and Is...
Explaining Judge Stoner’s Verdict in the Dacia Lacey Baby ‘Smothering’ Case (A Deep...
President Biden Says Voters Have to Choose Freedom Over Democracy
CBP Account Warns of *Consequences for Entering US Illegally (*Yeah, About That...)
Biden's Baffling Brain-Rot, Mayorkas' Worst Day Yet

NYT headline writer needs a biology lesson on how an umbilical cord works

The Washington Post’s Karen Tumulty called out the New York Times over this dopey headline on an article suggesting Bernie Sanders won’t be able to get Medicare for All passed even with a Dem-controlled Senate.

Advertisement

The NYT headline: “Even a Democratic Senate Wouldn’t Likely Cut the Cord on Sanders’s Baby.” Um, do they even know how umbilical cords work?

Their metaphor makes zero sense:

This metaphor wouldn’t be any better:

Anyway, now the headline reads, “Even if Sanders Wins, Medicare for All Almost Certainly Won’t Happen”:

Which has been true since Day 1 of the campaign so why are they just pointing this out now?

***

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement