LA Mayoral Hopeful Spencer Pratt Is the Anti-Mamdani, Supports Poopless, Stab-Free Public...
Economic Analysis: Wages Are Not Behaving
Ashley Allison Makes Scott Jennings’ Point That Ending Race-Based Districts Doesn’t Suppre...
Andy McCarthy Sounds Warning Siren About Caribbean Strikes
Jessica Tarlov PRAISES AOC for Moronic Attacks on Billionaires, Trips SPECTACULARLY Over H...
Thomas Massie Accused Me of Getting PAID to Disagree With Him and All...
DAMNING, Receipt-Filled Thread About VA State Sen. Louise Lucas' CRIMINAL Business Partner...
REEE! COPE-pocalypse CONTINUES! Dems Come Up With New (and Even DUMBER) Ideas After...
People Think This Photo of Justin Pearson Standing Up to the KKK Should...
Judge Rules DOGE ‘Blatantly Used’ Race and Sex in Mass Termination of Federal...
Ted Cruz Grades AOC's History Paper on Who the American Revolution Was Fought...
Woman Who Refused to Work With Prosecutors Didn’t Want to Send Another Black...
Brian Tyler Cohen: ABC Suing President Trump Over FCC Probe Into The View
Mehdi Hasan: AOC’s Superpower in 2028 Is Convincing Republicans She’s Dumb and Extreme
PBS, CBS News: Frontier Airlines Jet Hits ‘Pedestrian’ on Runway

NYT headline writer needs a biology lesson on how an umbilical cord works

The Washington Post’s Karen Tumulty called out the New York Times over this dopey headline on an article suggesting Bernie Sanders won’t be able to get Medicare for All passed even with a Dem-controlled Senate.

Advertisement

The NYT headline: “Even a Democratic Senate Wouldn’t Likely Cut the Cord on Sanders’s Baby.” Um, do they even know how umbilical cords work?

Their metaphor makes zero sense:

This metaphor wouldn’t be any better:

Anyway, now the headline reads, “Even if Sanders Wins, Medicare for All Almost Certainly Won’t Happen”:

Which has been true since Day 1 of the campaign so why are they just pointing this out now?

***

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement